Articles | Volume 16, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4723-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4723-2023
Research article
 | 
20 Oct 2023
Research article |  | 20 Oct 2023

Development of low-cost air quality stations for next-generation monitoring networks: calibration and validation of NO2 and O3 sensors

Alice Cavaliere, Lorenzo Brilli, Bianca Patrizia Andreini, Federico Carotenuto, Beniamino Gioli, Tommaso Giordano, Marco Stefanelli, Carolina Vagnoli, Alessandro Zaldei, and Giovanni Gualtieri

Related authors

PM10 variation, composition, and source analysis in Tuscany (Italy) following the COVID-19 lockdown restrictions
Fabio Giardi, Silvia Nava, Giulia Calzolai, Giulia Pazzi, Massimo Chiari, Andrea Faggi, Bianca Patrizia Andreini, Chiara Collaveri, Elena Franchi, Guido Nincheri, Alessandra Amore, Silvia Becagli, Mirko Severi, Rita Traversi, and Franco Lucarelli
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9987–10005, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9987-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9987-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Detection and long-term quantification of methane emissions from an active landfill
Pramod Kumar, Christopher Caldow, Grégoire Broquet, Adil Shah, Olivier Laurent, Camille Yver-Kwok, Sebastien Ars, Sara Defratyka, Susan Warao Gichuki, Luc Lienhardt, Mathis Lozano, Jean-Daniel Paris, Felix Vogel, Caroline Bouchet, Elisa Allegrini, Robert Kelly, Catherine Juery, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1229–1250, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms
Gang Wang, Chunlai Yu, Kai Guo, Haisong Guo, and Yibo Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 181–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024, 2024
Short summary
New insights from the Jülich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment: calibration functions traceable to one ozone reference instrument
Herman G. J. Smit, Deniz Poyraz, Roeland Van Malderen, Anne M. Thompson, David W. Tarasick, Ryan M. Stauffer, Bryan J. Johnson, and Debra E. Kollonige
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 73–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024, 2024
Short summary
Transferability of ML-based Global Calibration Models for NO2 and NO Low-Cost Sensors
Ayah Abu-Hani, Jia Chen, Vigneshkumar Balamurugan, Adrian Wenzel, and Alessandro Bigi
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-261,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-261, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for AMT
Short summary
Identification of spikes in continuous ground-based in situ time series of CO2, CH4 and CO: an extended experiment within the European ICOS Atmosphere network
Paolo Cristofanelli, Cosimo Fratticioli, Lynn Hazan, Mali Chariot, Cedric Couret, Orestis Gazetas, Dagmar Kubistin, Antti Laitinen, Ari Leskinen, Tuomas Laurila, Matthias Lindauer, Giovanni Manca, Michel Ramonet, Pamela Trisolino, and Martin Steinbacher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5977–5994, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Aleixandre, M., Gerboles, M., and Spinelle, L.: Report of the laboratory and in-situ validation of micro-sensors and evaluation of suitability of model equations NO9: CairClipNO2 of CAIRPOL (F), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, oCLC: 1111194588, 2013. a
Aula, K., Lagerspetz, E., Nurmi, P., and Tarkoma, S.: Evaluation of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Calibration Models, ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 3512889, https://doi.org/10.1145/3512889, 2022. a
Azen, R. and Budescu, D. V.: The Dominance Analysis Approach for Comparing Predictors in Multiple Regression, Psychol. Meth., 8, 129–148, https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129, 2003. a
Barcelo-Ordinas, J. M., Ferrer-Cid, P., Garcia-Vidal, J., Ripoll, A., and Viana, M.: Distributed Multi-Scale Calibration of Low-Cost Ozone Sensors in Wireless Sensor Networks, Sensors, 19, 2503, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112503, 2019. a
Download
Short summary
We assessed calibration models for two low-cost stations equipped with O3 and NO2 metal oxide sensors. Environmental parameters had improved accuracy in linear and black box models. Moreover, interpretability methods like SHapley Additive exPlanations helped identify the physical patterns and potential problems of these models in a field validation. Results showed both sensors performed well with the same linear model form, but unique coefficients were required for intersensor variability.