Articles | Volume 16, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-563-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-563-2023
Research article
 | 
30 Jan 2023
Research article |  | 30 Jan 2023

Estimates of the spatially complete, observational-data-driven planetary boundary layer height over the contiguous United States

Zolal Ayazpour, Shiqi Tao, Dan Li, Amy Jo Scarino, Ralph E. Kuehn, and Kang Sun

Related authors

Interannual variability of summertime formaldehyde (HCHO) vertical column density and its main drivers in northern high latitudes
Tianlang Zhao, Jingqiu Mao, Zolal Ayazpour, Gonzalo González Abad, Caroline Nowlan, and Yiqi Zheng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1431,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1431, 2023
Short summary
Development of the MEaSUREs blue band water vapor algorithm – Towards a long-term data record
Huiqun Wang, Gonzalo González Abad, Chris Chan Miller, Hyeong-Ahn Kwon, Caroline R. Nowlan, Zolal Ayazpour, Heesung Chong, Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance, Ewan O'Sullivan, Kang Sun, Robert Spurr, and Robert J. Hargreaves
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-66,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-66, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Global retrieval of stratospheric and tropospheric BrO columns from OMPS-NM onboard the Suomi-NPP satellite
Heesung Chong, Gonzalo González Abad, Caroline R. Nowlan, Christopher Chan Miller, Alfonso Saiz-Lopez, Rafael P. Fernandez, Hyeong-Ahn Kwon, Zolal Ayazpour, Huiqun Wang, Amir H. Souri, Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance, Ewan O’Sullivan, Jhoon Kim, Ja-Ho Koo, William R. Simpson, François Hendrick, Richard Querel, Glen Jaross, Colin Seftor, and Raid M. Suleiman
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1163,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1163, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Hailstorm events in the Central Andes of Peru: insights from historical data and radar microphysics
Jairo M. Valdivia, José Luis Flores-Rojas, Josep J. Prado, David Guizado, Elver Villalobos-Puma, Stephany Callañaupa, and Yamina Silva-Vidal
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2295–2316, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2295-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2295-2024, 2024
Short summary
Hybrid instrument network optimization for air quality monitoring
Nishant Ajnoti, Hemant Gehlot, and Sachchida Nand Tripathi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1651–1664, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1651-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1651-2024, 2024
Short summary
Objective identification of pressure wave events from networks of 1 Hz, high-precision sensors
Luke R. Allen, Sandra E. Yuter, Matthew A. Miller, and Laura M. Tomkins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 113–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-113-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-113-2024, 2024
Short summary
Adjustment of 1 min rain gauge time series using co-located drop size distribution and wind speed measurements
Arianna Cauteruccio, Mattia Stagnaro, Luca G. Lanza, and Pak-Wai Chan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4155–4163, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4155-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4155-2023, 2023
Short summary
Estimating turbulent energy flux vertical profiles from uncrewed aircraft system measurements: exemplary results for the MOSAiC campaign
Ulrike Egerer, John J. Cassano, Matthew D. Shupe, Gijs de Boer, Dale Lawrence, Abhiram Doddi, Holger Siebert, Gina Jozef, Radiance Calmer, Jonathan Hamilton, Christian Pilz, and Michael Lonardi
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2297–2317, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2297-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2297-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Angevine, W. M., Eddington, L., Durkee, K., Fairall, C., Bianco, L., and Brioude, J.: Meteorological model evaluation for CalNex 2010, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 3885–3906, 2012. a
Boersma, K. F., Jacob, D. J., Trainic, M., Rudich, Y., DeSmedt, I., Dirksen, R., and Eskes, H. J.: Validation of urban NO2 concentrations and their diurnal and seasonal variations observed from the SCIAMACHY and OMI sensors using in situ surface measurements in Israeli cities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3867–3879, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3867-2009, 2009. a
Chen, T. and Guestrin, C.: Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, in: Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 13–17 August 2016, San Francisco, CA, https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672, 785–794, 2016. a
Danielson, J. J. and Gesch, D. B.: Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010), Tech. rep., USGS, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20111073, 2011. a
Davis, K. J., Gamage, N., Hagelberg, C. R., Kiemle, C., Lenschow, D. H., and Sullivan, P. P.: An Objective Method for Deriving Atmospheric Structure from Airborne Lidar Observations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 17, 1455–1468, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1455:AOMFDA>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Download
Short summary
Accurate knowledge of the planetary boundary layer height (PBLH) is essential to study air pollution. However, PBLH observations are sparse in space and time, and PBLHs used in atmospheric models are often inaccurate. Using PBLH observations from the Aircraft Meteorological DAta Relay (AMDAR), we present a machine learning framework to produce a spatially complete PBLH product over the contiguous US that shows a better agreement with reference PBLH observations than commonly used PBLH products.