Chase, R. J., Harrison, D. R., Lackmann, G. M., and McGovern, A.: A Machine Learning Tutorial for Operational Meteorology, Part II: Neural Networks and Deep Learning, Weather Forecast., 38, 1271–1293, 2023. a
Cordoba, M., Dance, S. L., Kelly, G., Nichols, N. K., and Waller, J. A.: Diagnosing atmospheric motion vector observation errors for an operational high-resolution data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 333–341, 2017. a
Crespo, J. A. and Posselt, D. J.: A-Train-based case study of stratiform–convective transition within a warm conveyor belt, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 2069–2084, 2016. a
Friedman, J. H.: Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine, Ann. Stat., 29, 1189–1232, 2001.
a,
b
Gardner, M. W. and Dorling, S.: Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron) – a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences, Atmos. Environ., 32, 2627–2636, 1998.
a,
b
Gelaro, R., Langland, R. H., Pellerin, S., and Todling, R.: The THORPEX observation impact intercomparison experiment, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 4009–4025, 2010. a
Kawa, S., Erickson III, D., Pawson, S., and Zhu, Z.: Global CO
2 transport simulations using meteorological data from the NASA data assimilation system, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D18312,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004554, 2004.
a
Le Marshall, J., Rea, A., Leslie, L., Seecamp, R., and Dunn, M.: Error characterisation of atmospheric motion vectors, Australian Meteorological Magazine, 53, 123–131, 2004. a
Liu, Y., Heuvelink, G. B., Bai, Z., and He, P.: Uncertainty quantification of nitrogen use efficiency prediction in China using Monte Carlo simulation and quantile regression forests, Comput. Electron. Agr., 204, 107533,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107533, 2023.
a
Lux, O., Lemmerz, C., Weiler, F., Marksteiner, U., Witschas, B., Rahm, S., Geiß, A., and Reitebuch, O.: Intercomparison of wind observations from the European Space Agency's Aeolus satellite mission and the ALADIN Airborne Demonstrator, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2075–2097,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2075-2020, 2020.
a
Meinshausen, N. and Ridgeway, G.: Quantile regression forests, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 7, 983–999, 2006.
a,
b,
c,
d
Nguyen, H., Cressie, N., and Hobbs, J.: Sensitivity of optimal estimation satellite retrievals to misspecification of the prior mean and covariance, with application to OCO-2 retrievals, Remote Sens.-Basel, 11, 2770,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11232770, 2019.
a
Nicodemus, K. K., Malley, J. D., Strobl, C., and Ziegler, A.: The behaviour of random forest permutation-based variable importance measures under predictor correlation, BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 1–13, 2010. a
Nikou, M. and Tziachris, P.: Prediction and uncertainty capabilities of quantile regression forests in estimating spatial distribution of soil organic matter, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 11, 130,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020130, 2022.
a
Posselt, D. J., Wu, L., Mueller, K., Huang, L., Irion, F. W., Brown, S., Su, H., Santek, D., and Velden, C. S.: Quantitative assessment of state-dependent atmospheric motion vector uncertainties, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 58, 2479–2495, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d
Posselt, D. J., Wu, L., Schreier, M., Roman, J., Minamide, M., and Lambrigtsen, B.: Assessing the forecast impact of a geostationary microwave sounder using regional and global OSSEs, Mon. Weather Rev., 150, 625–645, 2022.
a,
b,
c
Salonen, K., Cotton, J., Bormann, N., and Forsythe, M.: Characterizing AMV height-assignment error by comparing best-fit pressure statistics from the Met Office and ECMWF data assimilation systems, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 54, 225–242, 2015. a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda, M. G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A description of the advanced research WRF version 3, NCAR Boulder, CO, USA, NCAR technical note, 475, 113 pp., 2008. a
Staffell, I. and Pfenninger, S.: Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output, Energy, 114, 1224–1239, 2016.
a,
b
Swail, V. R. and Cox, A. T.: On the use of NCEP–NCAR reanalysis surface marine wind fields for a long-term North Atlantic wave hindcast, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17, 532–545, 2000. a
Teixeira, J. V., Nguyen, H., Posselt, D. J., Su, H., and Wu, L.: Using machine learning to model uncertainty for water vapor atmospheric motion vectors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1941–1957,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1941-2021, 2021.
a
Vaysse, K. and Lagacherie, P.: Using quantile regression forest to estimate uncertainty of digital soil mapping products, Geoderma, 291, 55–64, 2017. a
Velden, C. S. and Bedka, K. M.: Identifying the uncertainty in determining satellite-derived atmospheric motion vector height attribution, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 48, 450–463, 2009.
a,
b
Wedel, A., Pock, T., Zach, C., Bischof, H., and Cremers, D.: An Improved Algorithm for TV-L1 Optical Flow, in: Statistical and Geometrical Approaches to Visual Motion Analysis, edited by: Cremers, D., Rosenhahn, B., Yuille, A. L., and Schmidt, F. R., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 23–45,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03061-1_2, 2009.
a
Yanovsky, I., Posselt, D., Wu, L., and Hristova-Veleva, S.: Quantifying Uncertainty in Atmospheric Winds Retrieved from Optical Flow: Dependence on Weather Regime, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., submitted, 2024.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Zach, C., Pock, T., and Bischof, H.: A Duality Based Approach for Realtime TV-L1 Optical Flow, in: Pattern Recognition, edited by: Hamprecht, F. A., Schnörr, C., and Jähne, B., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 214–223,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74936-3_22, 2007.
a
Zeng, X., Ackerman, S., Ferraro, R. D., Lee, T. J., Murray, J. J., Pawson, S., Reynolds, C., and Teixeira, J.: Challenges and opportunities in NASA weather research, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, ES137–ES140, 2016. a
