Articles | Volume 8, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3631-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3631-2015
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
08 Sep 2015
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 08 Sep 2015

The feasibility of water vapor sounding of the cloudy boundary layer using a differential absorption radar technique

M. D. Lebsock, K. Suzuki, L. F. Millán, and P. M. Kalmus

Related authors

Dual-frequency (Ka-band and G-band) radar estimates of liquid water content profiles in shallow clouds
Juan M. Socuellamos, Raquel Rodriguez Monje, Matthew D. Lebsock, Ken B. Cooper, and Pavlos Kollias
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2090,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2090, 2024
Short summary
A random forest algorithm for the prediction of cloud liquid water content from combined CloudSat–CALIPSO observations
Richard M. Schulte, Matthew D. Lebsock, John M. Haynes, and Yongxiang Hu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3583–3596, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3583-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3583-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multifrequency radar observations of marine clouds during the EPCAPE campaign
Juan M. Socuellamos, Raquel Rodriguez Monje, Matthew D. Lebsock, Ken B. Cooper, Robert M. Beauchamp, and Arturo Umeyama
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2701–2715, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2701-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2701-2024, 2024
Short summary
Water vapor measurements inside clouds and storms using a differential absorption radar
Luis F. Millán, Matthew D. Lebsock, Ken B. Cooper, Jose V. Siles, Robert Dengler, Raquel Rodriguez Monje, Amin Nehrir, Rory A. Barton-Grimley, James E. Collins, Claire E. Robinson, Kenneth L. Thornhill, and Holger Vömel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 539–559, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-539-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantifying the dependence of drop spectrum width on cloud drop number concentration for cloud remote sensing
Matthew D. Lebsock and Mikael Witte
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14293–14305, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14293-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14293-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Others (Wind, Precipitation, Temperature, etc.) | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Instruments and Platforms
The ALOMAR Rayleigh/Mie/Raman lidar: status after 30 years of operation
Jens Fiedler and Gerd Baumgarten
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5841–5859, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5841-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5841-2024, 2024
Short summary
The Far-INfrarEd Spectrometer for Surface Emissivity (FINESSE) – Part 1: Instrument description and level 1 radiances
Jonathan E. Murray, Laura Warwick, Helen Brindley, Alan Last, Patrick Quigley, Andy Rochester, Alexander Dewar, and Daniel Cummins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4757–4775, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4757-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4757-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of the effects of different lightning protection rods on the data quality of C-band weather radars
Cornelius Hald, Maximilian Schaper, Annette Böhm, Michael Frech, Jan Petersen, Bertram Lange, and Benjamin Rohrdantz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4695–4707, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4695-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4695-2024, 2024
Short summary
Wind comparisons between meteor radar and Doppler shifts in airglow emissions using field-widened Michelson interferometers
Samuel K. Kristoffersen, William E. Ward, and Chris E. Meek
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3995–4014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3995-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new dual-frequency stratospheric–tropospheric and meteor radar: system description and first results
Qingchen Xu, Iain Murray Reid, Bing Cai, Christian Adami, Zengmao Zhang, Mingliang Zhao, and Wen Li
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2957–2975, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2957-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2957-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Andersson, E., Hólm, E., Bauer, P., Beljaars, A., Kelly, G. A., McNally, A. P., Simmons, A. J., Thépaut, J.-N., and Tompkins, A. M.: Analysis and forecast impact of the main humidity observing systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1473–1485, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.112, 2007.
Ao, C. O., Meehan, T. K., Hajj, G. A., Mannucci, A. J., and Beyerle, G.: Lower troposphere refractivity bias in GPS occultation retrievals, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 4577, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003216, 2003.
Betts, A. K. and Boers, R.: A Cloudiness Transition in a Marine Boundary Layer, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 1480–1497, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<1480:ACTIAM>2.0.CO;2, 1990.
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and scattering of light by small particles, Wiley, New York, 477–482, 1983.
Browell, E. V., Wilkerson, T. D., and McIlrath, T. J.: Water vapor differential absorption lidar development and evaluation, Appl. Optics, 18, 3474, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.18.003474, 1979.
Download
Short summary
This paper describes the feasibility of using a differential absorption radar technique for the remote sensing of water vapor within clouds near the Earth surface from a spaceborne platform. The proposed methodology is shown to be theoretically achievable and complimentary to existing water vapor remote sensing methods.