Articles | Volume 11, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2459-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2459-2018
Research article
 | 
27 Apr 2018
Research article |  | 27 Apr 2018

Intercomparison of aerosol measurements performed with multi-wavelength Raman lidars, automatic lidars and ceilometers in the framework of INTERACT-II campaign

Fabio Madonna, Marco Rosoldi, Simone Lolli, Francesco Amato, Joshua Vande Hey, Ranvir Dhillon, Yunhui Zheng, Mike Brettle, and Gelsomina Pappalardo

Related authors

Effect of sampling error on ozone partial pressure trends within a unified ozonesounding dataset
Fabrizio Marra, Emanuele Tramutola, Marco Rosoldi, and Fabio Madonna
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2882,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2882, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Water vapour fluxes at a Mediterranean coastal site during the summer of 2021: observations, comparison with atmospheric reanalysis, and implications for extreme events
Fabio Madonna, Benedetto De Rosa, Simone Gagliardi, Ilaria Gandolfi, Yassmina Hesham Essa, Domenico Madonna, Fabrizio Marra, Maria Assunta Menniti, Donato Summa, Emanuele Tramutola, Faezeh Karimian Saracks, Filomena Romano, and Marco Rosoldi
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2024-32,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2024-32, 2024
Preprint under review for ESD
Short summary
Inter-comparison of atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) height estimates from different profiling sensors and models in the framework of HyMeX-SOP1
Donato Summa, Fabio Madonna, Noemi Franco, Benedetto De Rosa, and Paolo Di Girolamo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4153–4170, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4153-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4153-2022, 2022
Short summary
Intercomparison of Vaisala RS92 and RS41 radiosonde temperature sensors under controlled laboratory conditions
Marco Rosoldi, Graziano Coppa, Andrea Merlone, Chiara Musacchio, and Fabio Madonna
Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-337,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2021-337, 2021
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Radiosounding HARMonization (RHARM): a new homogenized dataset of radiosounding temperature, humidity and wind profiles with uncertainty
Fabio Madonna, Emanuele Tramutola, Souleymane Sy, Federico Serva, Monica Proto, Marco Rosoldi, Simone Gagliardi, Francesco Amato, Fabrizio Marra, Alessandro Fassò, Tom Gardiner, and Peter William Thorne
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-183,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-183, 2020
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Intercomparison of aerosol optical depth retrievals from GAW-PFR and SKYNET sun photometer networks and the effect of calibration
Angelos Karanikolas, Natalia Kouremeti, Monica Campanelli, Victor Estellés, Masahiro Momoi, Gaurav Kumar, Stephan Nyeki, and Stelios Kazadzis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6085–6105, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6085-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6085-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of Aeolus feature mask and particle extinction coefficient profile products using CALIPSO data
Ping Wang, David Patrick Donovan, Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff, Jos de Kloe, Dorit Huber, and Katja Reissig
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5935–5955, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5935-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5935-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assessment of the impact of NO2 contribution on aerosol-optical-depth measurements at several sites worldwide
Akriti Masoom, Stelios Kazadzis, Masimo Valeri, Ioannis-Panagiotis Raptis, Gabrielle Brizzi, Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, Francesca Barnaba, Stefano Casadio, Axel Kreuter, and Fabrizio Niro
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5525–5549, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5525-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improved mean field estimates from the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) Level-3 aerosol optical depth (L3 AOD) product: using spatiotemporal variability
Sooyon Kim, Yeseul Cho, Hanjeong Ki, Seyoung Park, Dagun Oh, Seungjun Lee, Yeonghye Cho, Jhoon Kim, Wonjin Lee, Jaewoo Park, Ick Hoon Jin, and Sangwook Kang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5221–5241, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5221-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5221-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of on-site calibration procedures for SKYNET Prede POM sun–sky photometers
Monica Campanelli, Victor Estellés, Gaurav Kumar, Teruyuki Nakajima, Masahiro Momoi, Julian Gröbner, Stelios Kazadzis, Natalia Kouremeti, Angelos Karanikolas, Africa Barreto, Saulius Nevas, Kerstin Schwind, Philipp Schneider, Iiro Harju, Petri Kärhä, Henri Diémoz, Rei Kudo, Akihiro Uchiyama, Akihiro Yamazaki, Anna Maria Iannarelli, Gabriele Mevi, Annalisa Di Bernardino, and Stefano Casadio
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 5029–5050, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5029-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-5029-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Campbell, J. R., Hlavka, D. L., Welton, E. J., Flynn, C. J., Turner, D. D., Spinhirne, J. D., Scott, V. S., and Hwang, I. H.: Full-time, eye-safe cloud and aerosol lidar observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program sites: instruments and data processing, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 431–442, 2002. 
D'Amico, G., Amodeo, A., Mattis, I., Freudenthaler, V., and Pappalardo, G.: EARLINET Single Calculus Chain – technical – Part 1: Pre-processing of raw lidar data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 491–507, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-491-2016, 2016. 
Flynn, C. J., Mendoza, A., Zheng, Y., and Mathur, S.: Novel polarization-sensitive micropulse lidar measurement technique, Opt. Express, 15, 2785–2790, 2007. 
Freudenthaler, V.: The Telecover Test: A Quality Assurance Tool for the Optical Part of a Lidar System, in: Proceed. of 24th International Laser Radar Conference, (https://www.meteo.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~st212fre/ILRC24/ILRC24-2008-S01P_30_Freudenthaler_Proceedings.pdf last access: 11 February 2015), 2008. 
Download
Short summary
The accurate monitoring of climate based on the use of low-cost and low-maintenance automatic system represents one of the challenges for the scientific community and instrument manufacturers for the next decade. In the frame of two experiments, INTERACT and INTERACT-II, taking place at CIAO (CNR-IMAA Atmospheric Observatory) in Tito Scalo, Potenza, Italy, commercial low-cost lidars have been compared with advanced lidar systems to assess their performances.