Articles | Volume 11, issue 6
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3815–3828, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3815-2018
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3815–3828, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3815-2018

Research article 28 Jun 2018

Research article | 28 Jun 2018

Methane profiles from GOSAT thermal infrared spectra

Arno de Lange and Jochen Landgraf

Related authors

Partitioning and budget of inorganic and organic chlorine species observed by MIPAS-B and TELIS in the Arctic in March 2011
G. Wetzel, H. Oelhaf, M. Birk, A. de Lange, A. Engel, F. Friedl-Vallon, O. Kirner, A. Kleinert, G. Maucher, H. Nordmeyer, J. Orphal, R. Ruhnke, B.-M. Sinnhuber, and P. Vogt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8065–8076, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8065-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8065-2015, 2015
Comparison of SMILES ClO profiles with satellite, balloon-borne and ground-based measurements
H. Sagawa, T. O. Sato, P. Baron, E. Dupuy, N. Livesey, J. Urban, T. von Clarmann, A. de Lange, G. Wetzel, B. J. Connor, A. Kagawa, D. Murtagh, and Y. Kasai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3325–3347, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3325-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3325-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Dealing with spatial heterogeneity in pointwise-to-gridded- data comparisons
Amir H. Souri, Kelly Chance, Kang Sun, Xiong Liu, and Matthew S. Johnson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 41–59, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-41-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-41-2022, 2022
Short summary
Biomass burning nitrogen dioxide emissions derived from space with TROPOMI: methodology and validation
Debora Griffin, Chris A. McLinden, Enrico Dammers, Cristen Adams, Chelsea E. Stockwell, Carsten Warneke, Ilann Bourgeois, Jeff Peischl, Thomas B. Ryerson, Kyle J. Zarzana, Jake P. Rowe, Rainer Volkamer, Christoph Knote, Natalie Kille, Theodore K. Koenig, Christopher F. Lee, Drew Rollins, Pamela S. Rickly, Jack Chen, Lukas Fehr, Adam Bourassa, Doug Degenstein, Katherine Hayden, Cristian Mihele, Sumi N. Wren, John Liggio, Ayodeji Akingunola, and Paul Makar
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7929–7957, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7929-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7929-2021, 2021
Short summary
Intercomparison of CO measurements from TROPOMI, ACE-FTS, and a high-Arctic ground-based Fourier transform spectrometer
Tyler Wizenberg, Kimberly Strong, Kaley Walker, Erik Lutsch, Tobias Borsdorff, and Jochen Landgraf
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7707–7728, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7707-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7707-2021, 2021
Short summary
Assessing the feasibility of using a neural network to filter Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) retrievals at northern high latitudes
Joseph Mendonca, Ray Nassar, Christopher W. O'Dell, Rigel Kivi, Isamu Morino, Justus Notholt, Christof Petri, Kimberly Strong, and Debra Wunch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7511–7524, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7511-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7511-2021, 2021
Short summary
TROPOMI tropospheric ozone column data: geophysical assessment and comparison to ozonesondes, GOME-2B and OMI
Daan Hubert, Klaus-Peter Heue, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Tijl Verhoelst, Marc Allaart, Steven Compernolle, Patrick D. Cullis, Angelika Dehn, Christian Félix, Bryan J. Johnson, Arno Keppens, Debra E. Kollonige, Christophe Lerot, Diego Loyola, Matakite Maata, Sukarni Mitro, Maznorizan Mohamad, Ankie Piters, Fabian Romahn, Henry B. Selkirk, Francisco R. da Silva, Ryan M. Stauffer, Anne M. Thompson, J. Pepijn Veefkind, Holger Vömel, Jacquelyn C. Witte, and Claus Zehner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7405–7433, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7405-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7405-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Bergamaschi, P. and Alexe, M.: Report on the quality of the inverted CH4 fluxes (second report), Tech. Rep. MACC-II Deliverable D_43.4, Tech. Rep., Joint Research Center, European Commission, 2014. a, b
Bergamaschi, P., Frankenberg, C., Meirink, J., Krol, M., Villani, M. G., Houweling, S., Dentener, F., Dlugokencky, E., Miller, J., Gatti, L., Engel, A., and Levin, I.: Inverse modeling of global and regional CH4 emissions using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D22301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012287, 2009. a
Borbas, E. and Ruston, B.: The RTTOV UWiremis IR land surface emissivity module, available at: http://nwpsaf.eu/vs_reports/nwpsaf-mo-vs-042.pdf (last access: 17 April 2018), 2010. a
Borbas, E., Knuteson, R., Seemann, S., Weisz, E., Moy, L., and Huang, H.-L.: A high spectral resolution global land surface infrared emissivity database, in: Joint 2007 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference and the 15th Satellite Meteorology & Oceanography Conference of the American Meteorological Society, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, available at: https://www.ssec.wisc.edu/meetings/jointsatmet2007/pdf/borbas_emissivity_database.pdf (last access: 15 May 2018), 2007. a
Borsdorff, T., Hasekamp, O. P., Wassmann, A., and Landgraf, J.: Insights into Tikhonov regularization: application to trace gas column retrieval and the efficient calculation of total column averaging kernels, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 523–535, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-523-2014, 2014. a
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric methane abundances as function of altitude derived from the thermal infrared band of the Japanese GOSAT satellite show a systematic bias. It has been shown that simple correction schemes can lead to undesired consequences. This paper discusses a more elaborate approach, resulting in methane profiles that fall within 2 % of independent reference measurements and models. This is true for different scenes around the globe and over the full altitude range.