Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3261-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3261-2022
Research article
 | 
01 Jun 2022
Research article |  | 01 Jun 2022

Machine learning techniques to improve the field performance of low-cost air quality sensors

Tony Bush, Nick Papaioannou, Felix Leach, Francis D. Pope, Ajit Singh, G. Neil Thomas, Brian Stacey, and Suzanne Bartington

Related authors

Enhancing Accuracy of Indoor Air Quality Sensors via Automated Machine Learning Calibration
Juncheng Qian, Thomas Wynn, Bowen Liu, Yuli Shan, Suzanne E. Bartington, Francis D. Pope, Yuqing Dai, and Zongbo Shi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3839,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3839, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Acoustic levitation of pollen and visualisation of hygroscopic behaviour
Sophie A. Mills, Adam Milsom, Christian Pfrang, A. Rob MacKenzie, and Francis D. Pope
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4885–4898, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4885-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4885-2023, 2023
Short summary
Evaluation of the WRF and CHIMERE models for the simulation of PM2.5 in large East African urban conurbations
Andrea Mazzeo, Michael Burrow, Andrew Quinn, Eloise A. Marais, Ajit Singh, David Ng'ang'a, Michael J. Gatari, and Francis D. Pope
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10677–10701, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10677-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10677-2022, 2022
Short summary
A study on the performance of low-cost sensors for source apportionment at an urban background site
Dimitrios Bousiotis, David C. S. Beddows, Ajit Singh, Molly Haugen, Sebastián Diez, Pete M. Edwards, Adam Boies, Roy M. Harrison, and Francis D. Pope
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4047–4061, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4047-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4047-2022, 2022
Short summary
Mass concentration measurements of autumn bioaerosol using low-cost sensors in a mature temperate woodland free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) experiment: investigating the role of meteorology and carbon dioxide levels
Aileen B. Baird, Edward J. Bannister, A. Robert MacKenzie, and Francis D. Pope
Biogeosciences, 19, 2653–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2653-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2653-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Alphasense Ltd.: NO2-A43F Nitrogen Dioxide Sensor 4-Electrode Technical Specification, https://www.alphasense.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/NO2-A43F.pdf (last access: 19 May 2021), 2019a. 
Alphasense Ltd.: OPC-N3 Particle Monitor Technical Specification, https://www.alphasense.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/OPC-N3.pdf (last access: 19 May 2021), 2019b. 
Berrar, D.: Cross-validation, in Encyclopaedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology: ABC of Bioinformatics, Elsevier, 3, 542–545, 2018. 
Bigi, A., Mueller, M., Grange, S. K., Ghermandi, G., and Hueglin, C.: Performance of NO, NO2 low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3717–3735, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3717-2018, 2018. 
Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors, Mach. Learn., 24, 123–140, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018054314350, 1996. 
Download
Short summary
Poor air quality is a human health risk which demands high-spatiotemporal-resolution monitoring data to manage. Low-cost air quality sensors present a convenient pathway to delivering these needs, compared to traditional methods, but bring methodological challenges which can limit operational ability. In this study within Oxford, UK, we develop machine learning methods to improve the quality of low-cost sensors for NO2, PM10 (particulate matter) and PM2.5 and demonstrate their effectiveness.
Share