Articles | Volume 7, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2273-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2273-2014
Research article
 | 
29 Jul 2014
Research article |  | 29 Jul 2014

Towards a consistent eddy-covariance processing: an intercomparison of EddyPro and TK3

G. Fratini and M. Mauder

Related authors

A long-term (2005–2019) eddy covariance data set of CO2 and H2O fluxes from the Tibetan alpine steppe
Felix Nieberding, Christian Wille, Gerardo Fratini, Magnus O. Asmussen, Yuyang Wang, Yaoming Ma, and Torsten Sachs
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2705–2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2705-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2705-2020, 2020
Short summary
A robust data cleaning procedure for eddy covariance flux measurements
Domenico Vitale, Gerardo Fratini, Massimo Bilancia, Giacomo Nicolini, Simone Sabbatini, and Dario Papale
Biogeosciences, 17, 1367–1391, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1367-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1367-2020, 2020
Short summary
Eddy covariance flux errors due to random and systematic timing errors during data acquisition
Gerardo Fratini, Simone Sabbatini, Kevin Ediger, Brad Riensche, George Burba, Giacomo Nicolini, Domenico Vitale, and Dario Papale
Biogeosciences, 15, 5473–5487, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5473-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5473-2018, 2018
Short summary
An improved dust emission model – Part 1: Model description and comparison against measurements
J. F. Kok, N. M. Mahowald, G. Fratini, J. A. Gillies, M. Ishizuka, J. F. Leys, M. Mikami, M.-S. Park, S.-U. Park, R. S. Van Pelt, and T. M. Zobeck
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13023–13041, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13023-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13023-2014, 2014
Short summary
Evaluation of a plot-scale methane emission model using eddy covariance observations and footprint modelling
A. Budishchev, Y. Mi, J. van Huissteden, L. Belelli-Marchesini, G. Schaepman-Strub, F. J. W. Parmentier, G. Fratini, A. Gallagher, T. C. Maximov, and A. J. Dolman
Biogeosciences, 11, 4651–4664, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4651-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4651-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Measurements of volatile organic compounds in ambient air by gas-chromatography and real-time Vocus PTR-TOF-MS: calibrations, instrument background corrections, and introducing a PTR Data Toolkit
Andrew R. Jensen, Abigail R. Koss, Ryder B. Hales, and Joost A. de Gouw
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5261–5285, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5261-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5261-2023, 2023
Short summary
Development of low-cost air quality stations for next-generation monitoring networks: calibration and validation of NO2 and O3 sensors
Alice Cavaliere, Lorenzo Brilli, Bianca Patrizia Andreini, Federico Carotenuto, Beniamino Gioli, Tommaso Giordano, Marco Stefanelli, Carolina Vagnoli, Alessandro Zaldei, and Giovanni Gualtieri
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4723–4740, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4723-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Detecting plumes in mobile air quality monitoring time series with density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise
Blake Actkinson and Robert J. Griffin
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3547–3559, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3547-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3547-2023, 2023
Short summary
New Insights From The Jülich Ozone-Sonde Intercomparison Experiments: Calibration Functions Traceable To One Ozone Reference Instrument
Herman G.J. Smit, Deniz Poyraz, Roeland Van Malderen, Anne M. Thompson, David W. Tarasick, Ryan M. Stauffer, Bryan J. Johnson, and Debra E. Kollonige
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1466,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1466, 2023
Short summary
Characterising the methane gas and environmental response of the Figaro Taguchi Gas Sensor (TGS) 2611-E00
Adil Shah, Olivier Laurent, Luc Lienhardt, Grégoire Broquet, Rodrigo Rivera Martinez, Elisa Allegrini, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3391–3419, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3391-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3391-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D. (Eds): Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 460 pp., 2012.
Foken, T. and Wichura, B.: Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 78, 83–105, 1996.
Foken, T., Göckede, M., Mauder, M., Mahrt, L., Amiro, B. D., and Munger, J. W.: Post-field data quality control, in: Handbook of Micrometeorology. A Guide for Surface Flux Measurements, edited by: Lee, X., Massman, W. J., and Law, B. E., Kluwer, Dordrecht, 181–208, 2004.
Foken, T., Leuning, R., Oncley, S. P., Mauder, M., and Aubinet, M.: Corrections and data quality, in: Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer, Dordrecht, 85–132, 2012.
Fratini, G., Ibrom, A., Arriga, N., Burba, G., and Papale, D.: Relative humidity effects on water vapour fluxes measured with closed-path eddy-covariance systems with short sampling lines, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 165, 53–63, 2012.
Download