Articles | Volume 9, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5163-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5163-2016
Research article
 | 
21 Oct 2016
Research article |  | 21 Oct 2016

Random uncertainties of flux measurements by the eddy covariance technique

Üllar Rannik, Olli Peltola, and Ivan Mammarella

Related authors

The high-frequency response correction of eddy covariance fluxes – Part 2: An experimental approach for analysing noisy measurements of small fluxes
Toprak Aslan, Olli Peltola, Andreas Ibrom, Eiko Nemitz, Üllar Rannik, and Ivan Mammarella
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5089–5106, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5089-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5089-2021, 2021
Short summary
The high-frequency response correction of eddy covariance fluxes – Part 1: An experimental approach and its interdependence with the time-lag estimation
Olli Peltola, Toprak Aslan, Andreas Ibrom, Eiko Nemitz, Üllar Rannik, and Ivan Mammarella
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5071–5088, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5071-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5071-2021, 2021
Short summary
Direct effect of aerosols on solar radiation and gross primary production in boreal and hemiboreal forests
Ekaterina Ezhova, Ilona Ylivinkka, Joel Kuusk, Kaupo Komsaare, Marko Vana, Alisa Krasnova, Steffen Noe, Mikhail Arshinov, Boris Belan, Sung-Bin Park, Jošt Valentin Lavrič, Martin Heimann, Tuukka Petäjä, Timo Vesala, Ivan Mammarella, Pasi Kolari, Jaana Bäck, Üllar Rannik, Veli-Matti Kerminen, and Markku Kulmala
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17863–17881, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17863-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17863-2018, 2018
Short summary
Uncertainty of eddy covariance flux measurements over an urban area based on two towers
Leena Järvi, Üllar Rannik, Tom V. Kokkonen, Mona Kurppa, Ari Karppinen, Rostislav D. Kouznetsov, Pekka Rantala, Timo Vesala, and Curtis R. Wood
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5421–5438, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5421-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5421-2018, 2018
Short summary
Boreal forest BVOC exchange: emissions versus in-canopy sinks
Putian Zhou, Laurens Ganzeveld, Ditte Taipale, Üllar Rannik, Pekka Rantala, Matti Petteri Rissanen, Dean Chen, and Michael Boy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14309–14332, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14309-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14309-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Detection and long-term quantification of methane emissions from an active landfill
Pramod Kumar, Christopher Caldow, Grégoire Broquet, Adil Shah, Olivier Laurent, Camille Yver-Kwok, Sebastien Ars, Sara Defratyka, Susan Warao Gichuki, Luc Lienhardt, Mathis Lozano, Jean-Daniel Paris, Felix Vogel, Caroline Bouchet, Elisa Allegrini, Robert Kelly, Catherine Juery, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1229–1250, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Research of low-cost air quality monitoring models with different machine learning algorithms
Gang Wang, Chunlai Yu, Kai Guo, Haisong Guo, and Yibo Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 181–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-181-2024, 2024
Short summary
New insights from the Jülich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment: calibration functions traceable to one ozone reference instrument
Herman G. J. Smit, Deniz Poyraz, Roeland Van Malderen, Anne M. Thompson, David W. Tarasick, Ryan M. Stauffer, Bryan J. Johnson, and Debra E. Kollonige
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 73–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-73-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identification of spikes in continuous ground-based in situ time series of CO2, CH4 and CO: an extended experiment within the European ICOS Atmosphere network
Paolo Cristofanelli, Cosimo Fratticioli, Lynn Hazan, Mali Chariot, Cedric Couret, Orestis Gazetas, Dagmar Kubistin, Antti Laitinen, Ari Leskinen, Tuomas Laurila, Matthias Lindauer, Giovanni Manca, Michel Ramonet, Pamela Trisolino, and Martin Steinbacher
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5977–5994, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5977-2023, 2023
Short summary
Data treatment and corrections for estimating H2O and CO2 isotope fluxes from high-frequency observations
Robbert P. J. Moonen, Getachew A. Adnew, Oscar K. Hartogensis, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, David J. Bonell Fontas, and Thomas Röckmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5787–5810, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5787-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5787-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Billesbach, D. P.: Estimating uncertainties in individual eddy covariance flux measurements: A comparison of methods and a proposed new method, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151 394–405, 2011.
Businger, J. A.: Evaluation of the accuracy with which dry deposition can be measured with current micrometeorological techniques, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 25, 1100–1124, 1986.
Detto, M., Verfaillie, J., Anderson, F., Xu, L., and Baldocchi, D.: Comparing laser-based open- and closed-path gas analyzers to measure methane fluxes using the eddy covariance method, Agric. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1312–1324, 2011.
Deventer, M. J., Held, A., El-Madanya, T. S., and Klemm, O.: Size-resolved eddy covariance fluxes of nucleation to accumulation mode aerosol particles over a coniferous forest, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 151, 1312–1324, 2015.
Finkelstein, P. L. and Sims, P. F.: Sampling error in eddy correlation flux measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3503–3509, 2001.
Download
Short summary
We review available methods for the random error estimation of turbulent fluxes that are widely used by the flux community. Flux errors are evaluated theoretically as well as via numerical calculations by using measured and simulated records. We recommend two flux random errors with clear physical meaning: the total error resulting from stochastic nature of turbulence, well approximated by the method of Finkelstein and Sims (2001), and the error of the flux due to the instrumental noise.