Articles | Volume 10, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2969-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2969-2017
Research article
 | 
18 Aug 2017
Research article |  | 18 Aug 2017

Mixing layer height as an indicator for urban air quality?

Alexander Geiß, Matthias Wiegner, Boris Bonn, Klaus Schäfer, Renate Forkel, Erika von Schneidemesser, Christoph Münkel, Ka Lok Chan, and Rainer Nothard

Related authors

Validation of the Aeolus L2B wind product with airborne wind lidar measurements in the polar North Atlantic region and in the tropics
Benjamin Witschas, Christian Lemmerz, Alexander Geiß, Oliver Lux, Uwe Marksteiner, Stephan Rahm, Oliver Reitebuch, Andreas Schäfler, and Fabian Weiler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 7049–7070, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7049-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-7049-2022, 2022
Short summary
Quality control and error assessment of the Aeolus L2B wind results from the Joint Aeolus Tropical Atlantic Campaign
Oliver Lux, Benjamin Witschas, Alexander Geiß, Christian Lemmerz, Fabian Weiler, Uwe Marksteiner, Stephan Rahm, Andreas Schäfler, and Oliver Reitebuch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6467–6488, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6467-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6467-2022, 2022
Short summary
Retrieval improvements for the ALADIN Airborne Demonstrator in support of the Aeolus wind product validation
Oliver Lux, Christian Lemmerz, Fabian Weiler, Uwe Marksteiner, Benjamin Witschas, Stephan Rahm, Alexander Geiß, Andreas Schäfler, and Oliver Reitebuch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1303–1331, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1303-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1303-2022, 2022
Short summary
Validation of Aeolus winds using radiosonde observations and numerical weather prediction model equivalents
Anne Martin, Martin Weissmann, Oliver Reitebuch, Michael Rennie, Alexander Geiß, and Alexander Cress
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2167–2183, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2167-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2167-2021, 2021
Short summary
On the spatial variability of the regional aerosol distribution as determined from ceilometers
Matthias Wiegner, Alexander Geiß, Ina Mattis, Fred Meier, and Thomas Ruhtz
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-332,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-332, 2020
Publication in ACP not foreseen
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
An empirical characterization of the aerosol Ångström exponent interpolation bias using SAGE III/ISS data
Robert P. Damadeo, Viktoria F. Sofieva, Alexei Rozanov, and Larry W. Thomason
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3669–3678, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3669-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3669-2024, 2024
Short summary
Retrievals of aerosol optical depth over the western North Atlantic Ocean during ACTIVATE
Leong Wai Siu, Joseph S. Schlosser, David Painemal, Brian Cairns, Marta A. Fenn, Richard A. Ferrare, Johnathan W. Hair, Chris A. Hostetler, Longlei Li, Mary M. Kleb, Amy Jo Scarino, Taylor J. Shingler, Armin Sorooshian, Snorre A. Stamnes, and Xubin Zeng
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2739–2759, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2739-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2739-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterization of dust aerosols from ALADIN and CALIOP measurements
Rui Song, Adam Povey, and Roy G. Grainger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2521–2538, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2521-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2521-2024, 2024
Short summary
Lidar depolarization characterization using a reference system
Alkistis Papetta, Franco Marenco, Maria Kezoudi, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Argyro Nisantzi, Holger Baars, Ioana Elisabeta Popovici, Philippe Goloub, Stéphane Victori, and Jean Sciare
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1721–1738, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1721-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1721-2024, 2024
Short summary
Improved Mean Field Estimates of GEMS AOD L3 Product: Using Spatio-temporal Variability
Sooyon Kim, Yeseul Cho, Hanjeong Ki, Seyoung Park, Dagun Oh, Seungjun Lee, Yeonghye Cho, Jhoon Kim, Wonjin Lee, Jaewoo Park, Ick Hoon Jin, and Sangwook Kang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-604,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-604, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alföldy, B., Osán, J., Toth, Z., Török, S., Harbusch, A., Jahn, C., Emeis, S., and Schäfer, K.: Aerosol optical depth, aerosol composition and air pollution during summer and winter conditions in Budapest, Sci. Total Environ., 383, 141–163, 2007.
Baars, H., Ansmann, A., Engelmann, R., and Althausen, D.: Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 7281–7296, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7281-2008, 2008.
Bachtiar, V. S., Davies, F., and Danson, F. M.: A combined model for improving estimation of atmospheric boundary layer height, Atmos. Environ. 98, 461–473, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.028, 2014.
Banks, R. F., Tiana-Alsina, J., Baldasano, J. M., Rocadenbosch, F., Papayannis, A., Solomos, S., and Tzanis, C. G.: Sensitivity of boundary-layer variables to PBL schemes in the WRF model based on surface meteorological observations, lidar, and radiosondes during the HygrA-CD campaign, Atmos. Res., 176–177, 185–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.02.024, 2016.
Barlow, J. F.: Progress in observing and modelling the urban boundary layer, Urban Climate, 10, 216–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2014.03.011, 2014.
Download
Short summary
Based on measurements with a ceilometer and from an air quality network, the relationship between the mixing layer height (MLH) and near surface concentrations of pollutants was investigated for summer 2014 in Berlin. It was found that the heterogeneity of the concentrations exceeds the differences due to different MLH retrievals. In particular for PM10 it seems to be unrealistic to find correlations between MLH and concentrations representative for an entire metropolitan area in flat terrain.