Articles | Volume 17, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1633-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1633-2024
Research article
 | 
19 Mar 2024
Research article |  | 19 Mar 2024

Assessment of current methane emission quantification techniques for natural gas midstream applications

Yunsong Liu, Jean-Daniel Paris, Gregoire Broquet, Violeta Bescós Roy, Tania Meixus Fernandez, Rasmus Andersen, Andrés Russu Berlanga, Emil Christensen, Yann Courtois, Sebastian Dominok, Corentin Dussenne, Travis Eckert, Andrew Finlayson, Aurora Fernández de la Fuente, Catlin Gunn, Ram Hashmonay, Juliano Grigoleto Hayashi, Jonathan Helmore, Soeren Honsel, Fabrizio Innocenti, Matti Irjala, Torgrim Log, Cristina Lopez, Francisco Cortés Martínez, Jonathan Martinez, Adrien Massardier, Helle Gottschalk Nygaard, Paula Agregan Reboredo, Elodie Rousset, Axel Scherello, Matthias Ulbricht, Damien Weidmann, Oliver Williams, Nigel Yarrow, Murès Zarea, Robert Ziegler, Jean Sciare, Mihalis Vrekoussis, and Philippe Bousquet

Related authors

Reassessment of the glyoxal-to-formaldehyde ratio RGF as a proxy for VOC source identification
Simon Bittner, Andreas Richter, Bianca Zilker, Sebastian Donner, Thomas Wagner, Alexandros Panagiotis Poulidis, Leonardo Alvarado, and Mihalis Vrekoussis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 8809–8838, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8809-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8809-2026, 2026
Short summary
Observations of nanoparticle shrinkage phenomena
Vijay P. Kanawade, Neha Deot, Mihai Ciobanu, Aliki Christodoulou, Marije van den Born, Chengfeng Liu, Alkistis Papetta, Rima Baalbaki, Michael Pikridas, Spyros Bezantakos, Anchal Garg, Chrysanthos Savvides, Efstratios Bourtsoukidis, George Biskos, Franco Marenco, Jean Sciare, and Tuija Jokinen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 8839–8854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8839-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8839-2026, 2026
Short summary
Ideas and perspectives: Max MACS – constraining the potential global scale of Marine Anoxic Carbon Storage for CO2 removal
Morgan Reed Raven, Nitai Amiel, Dror L. Angel, James P. Barry, Thomas M. Blattmann, Laura Boicenco, Antoine Crémière, Natalya Evans, Nora Gallarotti, Sebastian Haas, Jan-Hendrik Hehemann, Peter Krost, Pranay Lal, David Lordkipanidze, Tiia Luostarinen, Aaron M. Martinez, Allison J. Matzelle, Selma Menabit, Mihaela Muresan, Andreas Neumann, Jean-Daniel Paris, Christopher R. Pearce, Nick Reynard, Daniel L. Sanchez, Florence Schubotz, Violeta Slabakova, Adrian Stanica, Elena Stoica, Andrew K. Sweetman, Tina Treude, Yoana G. Voynova, and Nikolaos D. Zarokanellos
Biogeosciences, 23, 3755–3776, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-3755-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-3755-2026, 2026
Short summary
Microphysical and Compositional Differences Between Saharan and Middle Eastern Dust Revealed by UAS Observations
Maria Kezoudi, Alkistis Papetta, Konrad Kandler, Claire L. Ryder, Andreas Leonidou, Christos Keleshis, Chris Stopford, Troy Thornberry, Rodanthi-Elisavet Mamouri, Jean Sciare, and Franco Marenco
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 7361–7385, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7361-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7361-2026, 2026
Short summary
Source-Dependent Optical and Mineral Signatures of Dust Outbreaks over the Mediterranean
Alkistis Papetta, Celia Herrero del Barrio, S. Yeşer Aslanoğlu, Rizos-Theodoros Chadoulis, Georgia Charalampous, Sara Herrero-Anta, Dimitra Kouklaki, Michail Mytilinaios, Anna Moustaka, Emmanouil Proestakis, Vassilis Amiridis, Christos Spyrou, Antonis Gkikas, Michael Pikridas, Maria Kezoudi, Franco Marenco, Jean Sciare, Sophie Vandenbussche, Stavros Solomos, Stelios Kazadzis, and Ilias Fountoulakis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1956,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1956, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary

Cited articles

Albertson, J. D., Harvey, T., Foderaro, G., Zhu, P., Zhou, X., Ferrari, S., Amin, M. S., Modrak, M., Brantley, H., and Thoma, E. D.: A Mobile Sensing Approach for Regional Surveillance of Fugitive Methane Emissions in Oil and Gas Production, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 2487–2497, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05059, 2016. 
Allen, D. T.: Methane emissions from natural gas production and use: reconciling bottom-up and top-down measurements, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng., 5, 78–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2014.05.004, 2014. 
Allen, D. T., Torres, V. M., Thomas, J., Sullivan, D. W., Harrison, M., Hendler, A., Herndon, S. C., Kolb, C. E., Fraser, M. P., Hill, A. D., Lamb, B. K., Miskimins, J., Sawyer, R. F., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 17768–17773, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304880110, 2013. 
Ars, S., Broquet, G., Yver Kwok, C., Roustan, Y., Wu, L., Arzoumanian, E., and Bousquet, P.: Statistical atmospheric inversion of local gas emissions by coupling the tracer release technique and local-scale transport modelling: a test case with controlled methane emissions, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 5017–5037, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-5017-2017, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
We investigated the performance of 10 methane emission quantification techniques in a blind controlled-release experiment at an inerted natural gas compressor station. We reported their respective strengths, weaknesses, and potential complementarity depending on the emission rates and atmospheric conditions. Additionally, we assess the dependence of emission quantification performance on key parameters such as wind speed, deployment constraints, and measurement duration.
Share