Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-327-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-327-2025
Research article
 | 
21 Jan 2025
Research article |  | 21 Jan 2025

Aerosol layer height (ALH) retrievals from oxygen absorption bands: intercomparison and validation among different satellite platforms, GEMS, EPIC, and TROPOMI

Hyerim Kim, Xi Chen, Jun Wang, Zhendong Lu, Meng Zhou, Gregory R. Carmichael, Sang Seo Park, and Jhoon Kim

Related authors

Atmospheric processing and aerosol aging responsible for observed increase in absorptivity of long-range-transported smoke over the southeast Atlantic
Abdulamid A. Fakoya, Jens Redemann, Pablo E. Saide, Lan Gao, Logan T. Mitchell, Calvin Howes, Amie Dobracki, Ian Chang, Gonzalo A. Ferrada, Kristina Pistone, Samuel E. Leblanc, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, Arthur J. Sedlacek III, Thomas Eck, Brent Holben, Pawan Gupta, Elena Lind, Paquita Zuidema, Gregory Carmichael, and Connor J. Flynn
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7879–7902, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7879-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7879-2025, 2025
Short summary
Analysis of a saline dust storm from the Aralkum Desert – Part 1: Consistency between multisensor satellite aerosol products
Xin Xi, Jun Wang, Zhendong Lu, Andrew M. Sayer, Jaehwa Lee, Robert C. Levy, Yujie Wang, Alexei Lyapustin, Hongqing Liu, Istvan Laszlo, Changwoo Ahn, Omar Torres, Sabur Abdullaev, James Limbacher, and Ralph A. Kahn
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7403–7429, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7403-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7403-2025, 2025
Short summary
GEMS ozone profile retrieval: impact and validation of version 3.0 improvements
Juseon Bak, Arno Keppens, Daesung Choi, Sungjae Hong, Jae-Hwan Kim, Cheol-Hee Kim, Hyo-Jung Lee, Wonbae Jeon, Jhoon Kim, Ja-Ho Koo, Joowan Kim, Kanghyun Beak, Kai Yang, Xiong Liu, Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad, Klaus-Peter Heue, Jean-Christopher Lambert, Yeonjin Jung, Hyunkee Hong, and Won-Jin Lee
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2276,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2276, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
A decadal, hourly high-resolution satellite dataset of aerosol optical properties over East Asia
Jeewoo Lee, Jhoon Kim, Seoyoung Lee, Myungje Choi, Jaehwa Lee, Daniel J. Jacob, Su Keun Kuk, and Young-Je Park
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-281,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-281, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Retrieval algorithm for aerosol effective height from the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS)
Sang Seo Park, Jhoon Kim, Yeseul Cho, Hanlim Lee, Junsung Park, Dong-Won Lee, Won-Jin Lee, and Deok-Rae Kim
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2241–2259, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2241-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2241-2025, 2025
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Aerosols | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Estimating hourly ground-level aerosols using Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer aerosol optical depth: a machine learning approach
Sungmin O, Ji Won Yoon, and Seon Ki Park
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 1471–1484, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1471-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1471-2025, 2025
Short summary
Performance and evaluation of remote sensing satellites for monitoring dust weather in East Asia
Yuanyuan Zhang, Ning Wang, and Shuanggen Jin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-992,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-992, 2025
Short summary
Aerosol effects on day-ahead solar radiation forecasting
Xinyuan Hou, Kyriakoula Papachristopoulou, and Stelios Kazadzis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-891,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-891, 2025
Short summary
Decoupling the PBL Height, the Mixing Layer Height, and the Aerosol Layer Top in LiDAR Measurements over Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand
Ronald Macatangay, Thiranan Sonkaew, Sherin Hassan Bran, Worapop Thongsame, Titaporn Supasri, Mana Panya, Jeerasak Longmali, Raman Solanki, Ben Svasti Thomson, and Achim Haug
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-630,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-630, 2025
Short summary
A global perspective on CO2 satellite observations in high AOD conditions
Timo H. Virtanen, Anu-Maija Sundström, Elli Suhonen, Antti Lipponen, Antti Arola, Christopher O'Dell, Robert R. Nelson, and Hannakaisa Lindqvist
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 929–952, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-929-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-929-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Babu, S. S., Moorthy, K. K., Manchanda, R. K., Sinha, P. R., Satheesh, S. K., Vajja, D. P., Srinivasan, S., and Kumar, V. H. A.: Free tropospheric black carbon aerosol measurements using high altitude balloon: Do BC layers build “their own homes” up in the atmosphere?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L08803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl046654, 2011.​​​​​​​ 
Chang, D. and Song, Y.: Estimates of biomass burning emissions in tropical Asia based on satellite-derived data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2335–2351, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2335-2010, 2010. 
Chen, X.: Absorbing Aerosol Optical Central Height (AOCH) retrieved from TROPOMI with UIowa's AOCH-O2AB algorithm, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10407271, 2023. 
Chen, X., Xu, X. G., Wang, J., and Diner, D. J.: Can multi-angular polarimetric measurements in the oxygen-A and B bands improve the retrieval of aerosol vertical distribution?, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 270, 107679, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107679, 2021a. 
Chen, X., Wang, J., Xu, X. G., Zhou, M., Zhang, H. X., Garcia, L. C., Colarco, P. R., Janz, S. J., Yorks, J., McGill, M., Reid, J. S., de Graaf, M., and Kondragunta, S.: First retrieval of absorbing aerosol height over dark target using TROPOMI oxygen B band: Algorithm development and application for surface particulate matter estimates, Remote Sens. Environ., 265, 112674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112674, 2021b. 
Download
Short summary
We compare passive aerosol layer height (ALH) retrievals from the Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera (EPIC), TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), and Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) with lidar. GEMS shows a lower correlation (R = 0.64) than EPIC and TROPOMI (R > 0.7) but with minimal bias (0.1 km vs. overestimated by ~0.8 km). GEMS performance is improved for an ultraviolet aerosol index ≥ 3. EPIC and GEMS ALH diurnal variation differs slightly.
Share