Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5145-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5145-2023
Research article
 | 
03 Nov 2023
Research article |  | 03 Nov 2023

Local comparisons of tropospheric ozone: vertical soundings at two neighbouring stations in southern Bavaria

Thomas Trickl, Martin Adelwart, Dina Khordakova, Ludwig Ries, Christian Rolf, Michael Sprenger, Wolfgang Steinbrecht, and Hannes Vogelmann

Related authors

Measurement report: Violent biomass burning and volcanic eruptions – a new period of elevated stratospheric aerosol over central Europe (2017 to 2023) in a long series of observations
Thomas Trickl, Hannes Vogelmann, Michael D. Fromm, Horst Jäger, Matthias Perfahl, and Wolfgang Steinbrecht
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1997–2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1997-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1997-2024, 2024
Short summary
Zugspitze ozone 1970–2020: the role of stratosphere–troposphere transport
Thomas Trickl, Cédric Couret, Ludwig Ries, and Hannes Vogelmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8403–8427, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8403-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8403-2023, 2023
Short summary
The Far-Infrared Radiation Mobile Observation System (FIRMOS) for spectral characterization of the atmospheric emission
Claudio Belotti, Flavio Barbara, Marco Barucci, Giovanni Bianchini, Francesco D'Amato, Samuele Del Bianco, Gianluca Di Natale, Marco Gai, Alessio Montori, Filippo Pratesi, Markus Rettinger, Christian Rolf, Ralf Sussmann, Thomas Trickl, Silvia Viciani, Hannes Vogelmann, and Luca Palchetti
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2511–2529, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2511-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2511-2023, 2023
Short summary
A powerful lidar system capable of 1 h measurements of water vapour in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere as well as the temperature in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere
Lisa Klanner, Katharina Höveler, Dina Khordakova, Matthias Perfahl, Christian Rolf, Thomas Trickl, and Hannes Vogelmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 531–555, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-531-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-531-2021, 2021
Short summary
Three decades of tropospheric ozone lidar development at Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
Thomas Trickl, Helmuth Giehl, Frank Neidl, Matthias Perfahl, and Hannes Vogelmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6357–6390, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6357-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6357-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Advancing CH4 and N2O retrieval strategies for NDACC/IRWG FTIR observations with the support of airborne in situ measurements
Ivan Ortega, James W. Hannigan, Bianca C. Baier, Kathryn McKain, and Dan Smale
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2353–2371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2353-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2353-2025, 2025
Short summary
Atmospheric horizontal gradients measured with eight co-located GNSS stations and a microwave radiometer
Tong Ning and Gunnar Elgered
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2069–2082, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2069-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2069-2025, 2025
Short summary
Joint observations of oxygen atmospheric band emissions using OSIRIS and the MATS satellite
Björn Linder, Jörg Gumbel, Donal P. Murtagh, Linda Megner, Lukas Krasauskas, Doug Degenstein, Ole Martin Christensen, and Nickolay Ivchenko
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-493,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-493, 2025
Short summary
Validation of the version 4.5 MAESTRO ozone and NO2 measurements
Paul S. Jeffery, James R. Drummond, C. Thomas McElroy, Kaley A. Walker, and Jiansheng Zou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 569–602, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-569-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-569-2025, 2025
Short summary
Performance assessment of the IASI-O3 KOPRA product for observing midlatitude tropospheric ozone evolution for 15 years: validation with ozone sondes and consistency of the three IASI instruments
Gaëlle Dufour, Maxim Eremenko, Juan Cuesta, Gérard Ancellet, Michael Gill, Eliane Maillard Barras, and Roeland Van Malderen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4096,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4096, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Ancellet, G., Pelon, J., Beekmann, M., Papayannis, A., and Mégie, G.: Ground-Based Lidar Studies of Ozone Exchanges Between the Stratosphere and the Troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 22401–22421, 1991. 
Ancellet, G., Godin-Beekmann, S., Smit, H. G. J., Stauffer, R. M., Van Malderen, R., Bodichon, R., and Pazmiño, A.: Homogenization of the Observatoire de Haute Provence electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde data record: comparison with lidar and satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 3105–3120, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3105-2022, 2022. 
ATMOFAST: Atmosphärischer Ferntransport und seine Auswirkungen auf die Spurengaskonzentrationen in der freien Troposphäre über Mitteleuropa (Atmospheric Long-range Transport and its Impact on the Trace-gas Composition of the Free Troposphere over Central Europe), Project Final Report, co-ordinator: Trickl, T., subproject co-ordinators: Kerschgens, M., Stohl, A., and Trickl, T., funded by: the German Ministry of Education and Research within the programme “Atmosphärenforschung 2000”, 130 pp., http://www.trickl.de/ATMOFAST.htm (last access: 2 November 2023), 2005 (in German, with revised publication list of 2012). 
Attmannspacher, W. and Dütsch, H.: 2nd International Ozone Sonde Intercomparison at the Observatory of Hohenpeissenberg, Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes 157, Deutscher Wetterdienst, ISBN 978-3-88148-192-2, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201601273960 (last access: 29 October 2023), 1981. 
Beekmann, M., Ancellet, G., Mégie, G., Snit, H. G. J., and Kley, D.: Intercomparison Campaign of Vertical Ozone Profiles Including Electrochemical Sondes of ECC and Brewer-Mast Type and a Ground Based UV-Differential Absorption Lidar, J. Atmos. Chem., 19, 259–288, 1994. 
Download
Short summary
Tropospheric ozone have been measured for more than a century. Highly quantitative ozone measurements have been made at monitoring stations. However, deficits have been reported for vertical sounding systems. Here, we report a thorough intercomparison effort between a differential-absorption lidar system and two types of balloon-borne ozone sondes, also using ozone sensors at nearby mountain sites as references. The sondes agree very well with the lidar after offset corrections.
Share