Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-569-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-569-2025
Research article
 | 
03 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 03 Feb 2025

Validation of the version 4.5 MAESTRO ozone and NO2 measurements

Paul S. Jeffery, James R. Drummond, C. Thomas McElroy, Kaley A. Walker, and Jiansheng Zou

Related authors

Exploring ozone variability in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere using dynamical coordinates
Luis F. Millán, Peter Hoor, Michaela I. Hegglin, Gloria L. Manney, Harald Boenisch, Paul Jeffery, Daniel Kunkel, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Hao Ye, Thierry Leblanc, and Kaley Walker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7927–7959, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7927-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7927-2024, 2024
Short summary
Identifying episodic carbon monoxide emission events in the MOPITT measurement dataset
Paul S. Jeffery, James R. Drummond, Jiansheng Zou, and Kaley A. Walker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4253–4263, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4253-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4253-2024, 2024
Short summary
Water vapour and ozone in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere: global climatologies from three Canadian limb-viewing instruments
Paul S. Jeffery, Kaley A. Walker, Chris E. Sioris, Chris D. Boone, Doug Degenstein, Gloria L. Manney, C. Thomas McElroy, Luis Millán, David A. Plummer, Niall J. Ryan, Patrick E. Sheese, and Jiansheng Zou
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14709–14734, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14709-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14709-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Assessment of laboratory O4 (O2–O2 collision-induced) absorption cross-sections at 360 nm using atmospheric long-path DOAS observations
Bianca Lauster, Udo Frieß, Jan-Marcus Nasse, Ulrich Platt, and Thomas Wagner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3393–3405, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3393-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3393-2025, 2025
Short summary
Intercomparison of tropospheric ozone column datasets from combined nadir and limb satellite observations
Carlo Arosio, Viktoria Sofieva, Andrea Orfanoz-Cheuquelaf, Alexei Rozanov, Klaus-Peter Heue, Diego Loyola, Edward Malina, Ryan M. Stauffer, David Tarasick, Roeland Van Malderen, Jerry R. Ziemke, and Mark Weber
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3247–3265, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3247-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3247-2025, 2025
Short summary
Long-term evolution of the calibration constant on a mobile water vapour Raman lidar
Patrick Chazette, Julien Totems, and Frédéric Laly
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2681–2699, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2681-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2681-2025, 2025
Short summary
Advancing CH4 and N2O retrieval strategies for NDACC/IRWG FTIR observations with the support of airborne in situ measurements
Ivan Ortega, James W. Hannigan, Bianca C. Baier, Kathryn McKain, and Dan Smale
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2353–2371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2353-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2353-2025, 2025
Short summary
Atmospheric horizontal gradients measured with eight co-located GNSS stations and a microwave radiometer
Tong Ning and Gunnar Elgered
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2069–2082, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2069-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2069-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

ACE-FTS: Version 4.1/4.2 Level 2 Data, ACE-FTS [data set], https://databace.scisat.ca/level2/ (last access: 10 June 2024), 2024a. a
ACE-FTS: Version 5.2 Level 2 Data, ACE-FTS [data set], available at: https://databace.scisat.ca/level2/ (last access: 10 June 2024), 2024b. a
Adams, C., Strong, K., Batchelor, R. L., Bernath, P. F., Brohede, S., Boone, C., Degenstein, D., Daffer, W. H., Drummond, J. R., Fogal, P. F., Farahani, E., Fayt, C., Fraser, A., Goutail, F., Hendrick, F., Kolonjari, F., Lindenmaier, R., Manney, G., McElroy, C. T., McLinden, C. A., Mendonca, J., Park, J.-H., Pavlovic, B., Pazmino, A., Roth, C., Savastiouk, V., Walker, K. A., Weaver, D., and Zhao, X.: Validation of ACE and OSIRIS ozone and NO2 measurements using ground-based instruments at 80° N, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 927–953, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-927-2012, 2012. a, b, c, d
Adams, C., Bourassa, A. E., Bathgate, A. F., McLinden, C. A., Lloyd, N. D., Roth, C. Z., Llewellyn, E. J., Zawodny, J. M., Flittner, D. E., Manney, G. L., Daffer, W. H., and Degenstein, D. A.: Characterization of Odin-OSIRIS ozone profiles with the SAGE II dataset, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1447–1459, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1447-2013, 2013. a
Adams, C., Bourassa, A. E., Sofieva, V., Froidevaux, L., McLinden, C. A., Hubert, D., Lambert, J.-C., Sioris, C. E., and Degenstein, D. A.: Assessment of Odin-OSIRIS ozone measurements from 2001 to the present using MLS, GOMOS, and ozonesondes, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 49–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-49-2014, 2014. a
Download
Short summary
The MAESTRO instrument has been monitoring ozone and NO2 since February 2004. A new version of these data products has recently been released; however, these new products must be validated against other datasets to ensure their validity. This study presents such an assessment, using measurements from 11 satellite instruments to characterize the new MAESTRO products. In the stratosphere, good agreement is found for ozone and acceptable agreement is found for NO2 with these other datasets.
Share