Articles | Volume 10, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4363-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4363-2017
Research article
 | 
15 Nov 2017
Research article |  | 15 Nov 2017

Intercomparison of Pandora stratospheric NO2 slant column product with the NDACC-certified M07 spectrometer in Lauder, New Zealand

Travis N. Knepp, Richard Querel, Paul Johnston, Larry Thomason, David Flittner, and Joseph M. Zawodny

Related authors

OMPS-LP aerosol extinction coefficients and their applicability in GloSSAC
Mahesh Kovilakam, Larry W. Thomason, Magali Verkerk, Thomas Aubry, and Travis N. Knepp
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 535–553, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-535-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-535-2025, 2025
Short summary
Characterization of stratospheric particle size distribution uncertainties using SAGE II and SAGE III/ISS extinction spectra
Travis N. Knepp, Mahesh Kovilakam, Larry Thomason, and Stephen J. Miller
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2025–2054, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2025-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Quantifying SAGE II (1984–2005) and SAGE III/ISS (2017–2022) observations of smoke in the stratosphere
Larry W. Thomason and Travis Knepp
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10361–10381, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10361-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10361-2023, 2023
Short summary
SAGE III/ISS aerosol/cloud categorization and its impact on GloSSAC
Mahesh Kovilakam, Larry Thomason, and Travis Knepp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 2709–2731, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2709-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2709-2023, 2023
Short summary
Identification of smoke and sulfuric acid aerosol in SAGE III/ISS extinction spectra
Travis N. Knepp, Larry Thomason, Mahesh Kovilakam, Jason Tackett, Jayanta Kar, Robert Damadeo, and David Flittner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5235–5260, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5235-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5235-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Benchmarking data-driven inversion methods for the estimation of local CO2 emissions from synthetic satellite images of XCO2 and NO2
Diego Santaren, Janne Hakkarainen, Gerrit Kuhlmann, Erik Koene, Frédéric Chevallier, Iolanda Ialongo, Hannakaisa Lindqvist, Janne Nurmela, Johanna Tamminen, Laia Amorós, Dominik Brunner, and Grégoire Broquet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 211–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-211-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-211-2025, 2025
Short summary
Validation of 12 years (2008–2019) of IASI-A CO with IAGOS aircraft observations
Brice Barret, Pierre Loicq, Eric Le Flochmoën, Yasmine Bennouna, Juliette Hadji-Lazaro, Daniel Hurtmans, and Bastien Sauvage
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 129–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-129-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-129-2025, 2025
Short summary
Diurnal variations of NO2 tropospheric vertical column density over the Seoul metropolitan area from the Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS): seasonal differences and the influence of the a priori NO2 profile
Seunghwan Seo, Si-Wan Kim, Kyoung-Min Kim, Andreas Richter, Kezia Lange, John P. Burrows, Junsung Park, Hyunkee Hong, Hanlim Lee, Ukkyo Jeong, Jung-Hun Woo, and Jhoon Kim
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 115–128, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-115-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-115-2025, 2025
Short summary
Validation of ACE-FTS version 5.2 ozone data with ozonesonde measurements
Jiansheng Zou, Kaley A. Walker, Patrick E. Sheese, Chris D. Boone, Ryan M. Stauffer, Anne M. Thompson, and David W. Tarasick
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6983–7005, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6983-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6983-2024, 2024
Short summary
Intercomparison of long-term ground-based measurements of total, tropospheric, and stratospheric ozone at Lauder, New Zealand
Robin Björklund, Corinne Vigouroux, Peter Effertz, Omaira E. García, Alex Geddes, James Hannigan, Koji Miyagawa, Michael Kotkamp, Bavo Langerock, Gerald Nedoluha, Ivan Ortega, Irina Petropavlovskikh, Deniz Poyraz, Richard Querel, John Robinson, Hisako Shiona, Dan Smale, Penny Smale, Roeland Van Malderen, and Martine De Mazière
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6819–6849, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6819-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6819-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Brion, J., Chakir, A., Daumont, D., Malicet, J., and Parisse, C.: High-Resolution Laboratory Absorption Cross-Section of O3 – Temperature Effect, Chem. Phys. Lett., 213, 610–612, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(93)89169-I, 1993.
Cede, A.: Manual for Blick Software Suite 1.3, Luftblick, 1.3 edn., retrieval algorithm manual, available at: http://pandonia.net/media/documents/BlickSoftwareSuite_Manual_v7.pdf, last access: 14 November 2017.
Chance, K. and Spurr, R.: Ring effect studies: Rayleigh scattering, including molecular parameters for rotational Raman scattering, and the Fraunhofer spectrum, Appl. Optics, 36, 5224–5230, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.005224, 1997.
Chartrand, D., de Grandpre, J., and McConnell, J.: An introduction to stratospheric chemistry: Survey article, Canadian Middle Atmosphere Modelling Project Summer School, Cornwall, Canada, August 1997, Atmosphere-Ocean, 37, 309–367, 1999.
Chu, W. and McCormick, M.: Inversion of Stratospheric Aerosol and Gaseous Constituents from Spacecraft Solar Extinction Data in the 0.38–1.0 µm Wavelength Region, Appl. Optics, 18, 1404–1413, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.18.001404, 1979.
Download
Short summary
The SAGE-III instrument was launched in February 2017. As with any new instrument, a significant post-launch activity is planned to validate the data products. Validation of trace gases with short photolytic lifetimes is challenging, though careful use of Pandora-type instruments may prove beneficial. A careful intercomparison of Pandora and NIWA's M07 instrument was carried out. Results show Pandora to be well correlated with M07, showing its viability as a validation tool for SAGE science.