Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 3.668 IF 3.668
  • IF 5-year value: 3.707 IF 5-year
    3.707
  • CiteScore value: 6.3 CiteScore
    6.3
  • SNIP value: 1.383 SNIP 1.383
  • IPP value: 3.75 IPP 3.75
  • SJR value: 1.525 SJR 1.525
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 77 Scimago H
    index 77
  • h5-index value: 49 h5-index 49
AMT | Articles | Volume 12, issue 6
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3365–3381, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3365-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: Advances in cavity-based techniques for measurements of atmospheric...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3365–3381, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3365-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 26 Jun 2019

Research article | 26 Jun 2019

The ICAD (iterative cavity-enhanced DOAS) method

Martin Horbanski et al.

Related authors

Laser-induced fluorescence-based detection of atmospheric nitrogen dioxide and comparison of different techniques during the PARADE 2011 field campaign
Umar Javed, Dagmar Kubistin, Monica Martinez, Jan Pollmann, Markus Rudolf, Uwe Parchatka, Andreas Reiffs, Jim Thieser, Gerhard Schuster, Martin Horbanski, Denis Pöhler, John N. Crowley, Horst Fischer, Jos Lelieveld, and Hartwig Harder
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1461–1481, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1461-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1461-2019, 2019
Short summary
Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of on-road NO2 concentrations in Hong Kong
Ying Zhu, Ka Lok Chan, Yun Fat Lam, Martin Horbanski, Denis Pöhler, Johannes Boll, Ivo Lipkowitsch, Sheng Ye, and Mark Wenig
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6719–6734, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6719-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6719-2018, 2018
Short summary
The Heidelberg Airborne Imaging DOAS Instrument (HAIDI) – a novel imaging DOAS device for 2-D and 3-D imaging of trace gases and aerosols
S. General, D. Pöhler, H. Sihler, N. Bobrowski, U. Frieß, J. Zielcke, M. Horbanski, P. B. Shepson, B. H. Stirm, W. R. Simpson, K. Weber, C. Fischer, and U. Platt
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3459–3485, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3459-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3459-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Data Processing and Information Retrieval
Towards standardized processing of eddy covariance flux measurements of carbonyl sulfide
Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Pasi Kolari, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Huilin Chen, Ulli Seibt, Wu Sun, and Ivan Mammarella
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3957–3975, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3957-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3957-2020, 2020
Short summary
Integration and calibration of non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) CO2 low-cost sensors and their operation in a sensor network covering Switzerland
Michael Müller, Peter Graf, Jonas Meyer, Anastasia Pentina, Dominik Brunner, Fernando Perez-Cruz, Christoph Hüglin, and Lukas Emmenegger
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3815–3834, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3815-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3815-2020, 2020
Correcting the impact of the isotope composition on the mixing ratio dependency of water vapour isotope measurements with cavity ring-down spectrometers
Yongbiao Weng, Alexandra Touzeau, and Harald Sodemann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3167–3190, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3167-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3167-2020, 2020
Short summary
Correcting high-frequency losses of reactive nitrogen flux measurements
Pascal Wintjen, Christof Ammann, Frederik Schrader, and Christian Brümmer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2923–2948, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2923-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2923-2020, 2020
Short summary
Surface flux estimates derived from UAS-based mole fraction measurements by means of a nocturnal boundary layer budget approach
Martin Kunz, Jost V. Lavric, Rainer Gasche, Christoph Gerbig, Richard H. Grant, Frank-Thomas Koch, Marcus Schumacher, Benjamin Wolf, and Matthias Zeeman
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1671–1692, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1671-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1671-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Allan, D. W.: Statistics of atomic frequency standards, P. IEEE, 54, 221–230, https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1966.4634, 1966. a
Ball, S. M., Langridge, J. M., and Jones, R. L.: Broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy using light emitting diodes, Chem. Phys. Lett., 398, 68–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.08.144, 2004. a
Bodhaine, B., Wood, N., Dutton, E., and Slusser, J. R.: On Rayleigh Optical Depth Calculations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 16, 1854–1861, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<1854:ORODC>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a, b
Buxmann, J., Balzer, N., Bleicher, S., Platt, U., and Zetzsch, C.: Observations of bromine explosions in smog chamber experiments above a model salt pan, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 44, 312–326, https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20714, 2012. a
Engeln, R., Berden, G., Peeters, R., and Meijer, G.: Cavity enhanced absorption and cavity enhanced magnetic rotation spectroscopy, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 69, 3763, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1149176, 1998. a
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
ICAD allows a precise in situ measurement of gases like NO2 in a relatively simple and compact setup. The main advantage in comparison to most other optical methods is that it does not require a stable total light intensity. This allows a simpler and mobile instrument setup and additionally it features no observed cross-interferences. We validated the high quality for an ICAD NO2 instrument in different inter-comparisons with a detection limit of 0.02 ppbv.
ICAD allows a precise in situ measurement of gases like NO2 in a relatively simple and compact...
Citation