Articles | Volume 10, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2021-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2021-2017
Research article
 | 
07 Jun 2017
Research article |  | 07 Jun 2017

Methods to homogenize electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesonde measurements across changes in sensing solution concentration or ozonesonde manufacturer

Terry Deshler, Rene Stübi, Francis J. Schmidlin, Jennifer L. Mercer, Herman G. J. Smit, Bryan J. Johnson, Rigel Kivi, and Bruno Nardi

Related authors

Producing aerosol size distributions consistent with optical particle counter measurements using space-based measurements of aerosol extinction coefficient
Nicholas Ernest, Larry W. Thomason, and Terry Deshler
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2957–2968, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2957-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2957-2025, 2025
Short summary
Spatiotemporal variations of stratospheric aerosol size between 2002 and 2005 from measurements with SAGE III/M3M
Felix Wrana, Terry Deshler, Christian Löns, Larry W. Thomason, and Christian von Savigny
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3717–3736, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3717-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3717-2025, 2025
Short summary
Stratospheric aerosol characteristics from SCIAMACHY limb observations: two-parameter retrieval
Christine Pohl, Felix Wrana, Alexei Rozanov, Terry Deshler, Elizaveta Malinina, Christian von Savigny, Landon A. Rieger, Adam E. Bourassa, and John P. Burrows
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 4153–4181, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4153-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4153-2024, 2024
Short summary
Description and performance of a sectional aerosol microphysical model in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
Simone Tilmes, Michael J. Mills, Yunqian Zhu, Charles G. Bardeen, Francis Vitt, Pengfei Yu, David Fillmore, Xiaohong Liu, Brian Toon, and Terry Deshler
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6087–6125, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6087-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6087-2023, 2023
Short summary
A fiber-optic distributed temperature sensor for continuous in situ profiling up to 2 km beneath constant-altitude scientific balloons
J. Douglas Goetz, Lars E. Kalnajs, Terry Deshler, Sean M. Davis, Martina Bramberger, and M. Joan Alexander
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 791–807, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-791-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-791-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: In Situ Measurement | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Improving consistency in methane emission quantification from the natural gas distribution systems across measurement devices
Judith Tettenborn, Daniel Zavala-Araiza, Daan Stroeken, Hossein Maazallahi, Carina van der Veen, Arjan Hensen, Ilona Velzeboer, Pim van den Bulk, Felix Vogel, Lawson Gillespie, Sebastien Ars, James France, David Lowry, Rebecca Fisher, and Thomas Röckmann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3569–3584, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3569-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3569-2025, 2025
Short summary
Interpretation of mass spectra by a Vocus proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) at an urban site: insights from gas chromatographic pre-separation
Ying Zhang, Yuwei Wang, Chuang Li, Yueyang Li, Sijia Yin, Megan S. Claflin, Brian M. Lerner, Douglas Worsnop, and Lin Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3547–3568, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3547-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3547-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improving the quantification of peak concentrations for air quality sensors via data weighting
Caroline Frischmon, Jonathan Silberstein, Annamarie Guth, Erick Mattson, Jack Porter, and Michael Hannigan
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3147–3159, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3147-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3147-2025, 2025
Short summary
Long-term observations of atmospheric CO2 and CH4 trends and comparison of two measurement systems at Pallas-Sammaltunturi station in Northern Finland
Antti Laitinen, Hermanni Aaltonen, Christoph Zellweger, Aki Tsuruta, Tuula Aalto, and Juha Hatakka
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3109–3133, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3109-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3109-2025, 2025
Short summary
Evaluating mass flow meter measurements from chambers for greenhouse gas emission from orphan wells and other point sources
Karl B. Haase and Nicholas J. Gianoutsos
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1201,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1201, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Barnes, R. A., Bandy, A. R., and Torres, A. L.: Electrochemical concentration cell ozonesonde accuracy and precision, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 7881–7887, 1985.
Beekmann, M., Ancellet, G., Megie, G., Smit, H., and Kley, D.: Intercomparison campaign for vertical ozone profiles including electrochemical sondes of ECC and Brewer-Mast type and a ground based UV-differential absorption lidar, J. Atmos. Chem., 19, 259–288, 1994.
Boyd, A. W., Willis, C., and Cyr, R.: New determination of stoichiometry of the iodometric method for ozone analysis at pH 7.0, Anal. Chem., 42, 670–672, 1970.
Boyd, I., Bodeker, G., Connor, B., Swart, D., and Brinksma, E.: An assessment of ECC ozondesondes operated using 1 % and 0.5 % KI cathode solutions at Lauder, New Zealand, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2409–2412, 1998.
Brewer, A. W. and Milford, J. R.: The Oxford-Kew ozondesonde, P. R. Soc. Lond. A., 256, 470–495, 1960.
Download
Short summary
Ozonesondes, small balloon-borne instruments to measure ozone profiles, are used once and lost. Quality control is thus essential. From the mid-1990s to late 2000s differences in manufacturers' (Science Pump and ENSCI) recommended sensor solution concentrations, 1.0 % and 0.5 % potassium iodide, led to some confusion. This paper uses comparison measurements to derive transfer functions to homogenize the measurements made with non-standard combinations of instrument and sensor solution.
Share