Articles | Volume 8, issue 9
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3923–3940, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3923-2015
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3923–3940, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3923-2015
Research article
24 Sep 2015
Research article | 24 Sep 2015

The GOME-type Total Ozone Essential Climate Variable (GTO-ECV) data record from the ESA Climate Change Initiative

M. Coldewey-Egbers et al.

Related authors

Global, regional and seasonal analysis of total ozone trends derived from the 1995–2020 GTO-ECV climate data record
Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Diego G. Loyola, Christophe Lerot, and Michel Van Roozendael​​​​​​​
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6861–6878, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6861-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6861-2022, 2022
Short summary
Global total ozone recovery trends attributed to ozone-depleting substance (ODS) changes derived from five merged ozone datasets
Mark Weber, Carlo Arosio, Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Vitali E. Fioletov, Stacey M. Frith, Jeannette D. Wild, Kleareti Tourpali, John P. Burrows, and Diego Loyola
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6843–6859, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6843-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6843-2022, 2022
Short summary
Record low ozone values over the Arctic in boreal spring 2020
Martin Dameris, Diego G. Loyola, Matthias Nützel, Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Christophe Lerot, Fabian Romahn, and Michel van Roozendael
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 617–633, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-617-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-617-2021, 2021
Short summary
Comparison of GTO-ECV and adjusted MERRA-2 total ozone columns from the last 2 decades and assessment of interannual variability
Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Diego G. Loyola, Gordon Labow, and Stacey M. Frith
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1633–1654, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1633-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1633-2020, 2020
Short summary
The use of QBO, ENSO, and NAO perturbations in the evaluation of GOME-2 MetOp A total ozone measurements
Kostas Eleftheratos, Christos S. Zerefos, Dimitris S. Balis, Maria-Elissavet Koukouli, John Kapsomenakis, Diego G. Loyola, Pieter Valks, Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Christophe Lerot, Stacey M. Frith, Amund S. Haslerud, Ivar S. A. Isaksen, and Seppo Hassinen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 987–1011, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-987-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-987-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Solar occultation measurement of mesospheric ozone by SAGE III/ISS: impact of variations along the line of sight caused by photochemistry
Murali Natarajan, Robert Damadeo, and David Flittner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 75–87, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-75-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-75-2023, 2023
Short summary
Understanding the potential of Sentinel-2 for monitoring methane point emissions
Javier Gorroño, Daniel J. Varon, Itziar Irakulis-Loitxate, and Luis Guanter
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 89–107, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-89-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-89-2023, 2023
Short summary
TROPOMI/S5P Total Column Water Vapor validation against AERONET ground-based measurements
Katerina Garane, Ka Lok Chan, Maria-Elissavet Koukouli, Diego Loyola, and Dimitris Balis
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 57–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-57-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-57-2023, 2023
Short summary
Assessing the consistency of satellite-derived upper tropospheric humidity measurements
Lei Shi, Carl J. Schreck III, Viju O. John, Eui-Seok Chung, Theresa Lang, Stefan A. Buehler, and Brian J. Soden
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6949–6963, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6949-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6949-2022, 2022
Short summary
A comparison of carbon monoxide retrievals between the MOPITT satellite and Canadian high-Arctic ground-based NDACC and TCCON FTIR measurements
Ali Jalali, Kaley A. Walker, Kimberly Strong, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Merritt N. Deeter, Debra Wunch, Sébastien Roche, Tyler Wizenberg, Erik Lutsch, Erin McGee, Helen M. Worden, Pierre Fogal, and James R. Drummond
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6837–6863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Balis, D., Kroon, M., Koukouli, M. E., Brinksma, E. J., Labow, G., Veefkind, J. P., and McPeters, R. D.: Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument total ozone column measurements using Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometer ground-based observations, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D24S46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008796, 2007a.
Balis, D., Lambert, J.-C., van Roozendael, M., Spurr, R., Loyola, D., Livschitz, Y., Valks, P., Amiridis, V., Gerard, P., Granville, J., and Zehner, C.: Ten years of GOME/ERS2 total ozone data. The new GOME data processor (GDP) version 4: 2. Ground-based validation and comparisons with TOMS V7/V8, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D07307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006376, 2007b.
Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noel, S., Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.: SCIAMACHY: mission objectives and measurement modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, 1999.
Burrows, J. P., Weber, M., Buchwitz, M., Rozanov, V. V., Ladstädter-Weissenmayer, A., Richter, A., de Beek, R., Hoogen, R., Bramstedt, K., Eichmann, K.-U., Eisinger, M., and Perner, D.: The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME): mission concept and first scientific results, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 151–175, 1999.
Callies, J., Corpaccioli, E., Eisinger, M., Hahne, A., and Lefebvre, A.: GOME-2 – Metop's second generation sensor for operational ozone monitoring, ESA Bull.-Eur. Space, 102, 28–36, 2000.