Articles | Volume 10, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4521-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4521-2017
Research article
 | 
22 Nov 2017
Research article |  | 22 Nov 2017

Quality assessment of integrated water vapour measurements at the St. Petersburg site, Russia: FTIR vs. MW and GPS techniques

Yana A. Virolainen, Yury M. Timofeyev, Vladimir S. Kostsov, Dmitry V. Ionov, Vladislav V. Kalinnikov, Maria V. Makarova, Anatoly V. Poberovsky, Nikita A. Zaitsev, Hamud H. Imhasin, Alexander V. Polyakov, Matthias Schneider, Frank Hase, Sabine Barthlott, and Thomas Blumenstock

Related authors

Measurements of CFC-11, CFC-12, and HCFC-22 total columns in the atmosphere at the St. Petersburg site in 2009–2019
Alexander Polyakov, Anatoly Poberovsky, Maria Makarova, Yana Virolainen, Yuri Timofeyev, and Anastasiia Nikulina
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5349–5368, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5349-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5349-2021, 2021
Short summary
The CO2 integral emission by the megacity of St Petersburg as quantified from ground-based FTIR measurements combined with dispersion modelling
Dmitry V. Ionov, Maria V. Makarova, Frank Hase, Stefani C. Foka, Vladimir S. Kostsov, Carlos Alberti, Thomas Blumenstock, Thorsten Warneke, and Yana A. Virolainen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10939–10963, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10939-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10939-2021, 2021
Short summary
Emission Monitoring Mobile Experiment (EMME): an overview and first results of the St. Petersburg megacity campaign 2019
Maria V. Makarova, Carlos Alberti, Dmitry V. Ionov, Frank Hase, Stefani C. Foka, Thomas Blumenstock, Thorsten Warneke, Yana A. Virolainen, Vladimir S. Kostsov, Matthias Frey, Anatoly V. Poberovskii, Yuri M. Timofeyev, Nina N. Paramonova, Kristina A. Volkova, Nikita A. Zaitsev, Egor Y. Biryukov, Sergey I. Osipov, Boris K. Makarov, Alexander V. Polyakov, Viktor M. Ivakhov, Hamud Kh. Imhasin, and Eugene F. Mikhailov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1047–1073, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1047-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1047-2021, 2021
Short summary
Case study of ozone anomalies over northern Russia in the 2015/2016 winter: measurements and numerical modelling
Yury M. Timofeyev, Sergei P. Smyshlyaev, Yana A. Virolainen, Alexander S. Garkusha, Alexander V. Polyakov, Maxim A. Motsakov, and Ole Kirner
Ann. Geophys., 36, 1495–1505, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1495-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1495-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Validation of the version 4.5 MAESTRO ozone and NO2 measurements
Paul S. Jeffery, James R. Drummond, C. Thomas McElroy, Kaley A. Walker, and Jiansheng Zou
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 569–602, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-569-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-569-2025, 2025
Short summary
Advancing CH4 and N2O retrieval strategies for NDACC/IRWG high-resolution direct-sun FTIR Observations
Ivan Ortega, James W. Hannigan, Bianca C. Baier, Kathryn McKain, and Dan Smale
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3815,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3815, 2025
Short summary
Long-term evolution of the calibration constant on a mobile/field campaign water vapour Raman lidar
Patrick Chazette, Julien Totems, and Frédéric Laly
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3583,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3583, 2025
Short summary
Benchmarking data-driven inversion methods for the estimation of local CO2 emissions from synthetic satellite images of XCO2 and NO2
Diego Santaren, Janne Hakkarainen, Gerrit Kuhlmann, Erik Koene, Frédéric Chevallier, Iolanda Ialongo, Hannakaisa Lindqvist, Janne Nurmela, Johanna Tamminen, Laia Amorós, Dominik Brunner, and Grégoire Broquet
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 211–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-211-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-211-2025, 2025
Short summary
Validation of 12 years (2008–2019) of IASI-A CO with IAGOS aircraft observations
Brice Barret, Pierre Loicq, Eric Le Flochmoën, Yasmine Bennouna, Juliette Hadji-Lazaro, Daniel Hurtmans, and Bastien Sauvage
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 129–149, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-129-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-129-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Askne, J. and Nordius, H.: Estimation of tropospheric delay for microwaves from surface weather data, Radio Sci., 22, 379–386, 1987
Berezin, I. A., Timofeyev, Yu. M., Virolainen, Ya. A., and Volkova, K. A.: Comparison of ground-based microwave measurements of precipitable water vapor with radiosounding data, Atmos. Ocean. Opt., 29, 274–281, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856016030040, 2016.
Berezin, I. A., Timofeyev, Yu. M., Virolainen, Ya. A., Frantsuzova, I. S., Volkova, K. A., Poberovsky, A. V., Holben, B. N., Smirnov, A., and Slutsker, I: Error analysis of integrated water vapor measured by ÑIMEL Photometer, Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phy.+, 53, 58–64, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433817010030, 2017.
Bevis, M., Businger, S., Herring, T., Rocken, C., Anthes, R., and Wave, R.: GPS meteorology: remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using the global positioning system, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 787–801, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01517, 1992.
Download
Short summary
Water vapour is one of the most important gases in the Earth’s atmosphere and plays a unique role in climate and weather forming. Cross-comparison of different systems for monitoring the atmospheric integrated water vapour (IWV) measurements is an essential part of their testing and validation protocol. We compare coincident measurements of IWV by different techniques over Saint Petersburg (Russia), assess their quality in various atmospheric conditions, and give recommendation for data users.
Share