Articles | Volume 9, issue 9
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4471–4485, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4471-2016
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4471–4485, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4471-2016
Research article
09 Sep 2016
Research article | 09 Sep 2016

Intercomparison of stratospheric nitrogen dioxide columns retrieved from ground-based DOAS and FTIR and satellite DOAS instruments over the subtropical Izana station

Cristina Robles-Gonzalez et al.

Related authors

Comparison of OCO-2 target observations to MUCCnet – is it possible to capture urban XCO2 gradients from space?
Maximilian Rißmann, Jia Chen, Gregory Osterman, Xinxu Zhao, Florian Dietrich, Moritz Makowski, Frank Hase, and Matthäus Kiel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6605–6623, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6605-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6605-2022, 2022
Short summary
Measurement report: Evolution and distribution of NH3 over Mexico City from ground-based and satellite infrared spectroscopic measurements
Beatriz Herrera, Alejandro Bezanilla, Thomas Blumenstock, Enrico Dammers, Frank Hase, Lieven Clarisse, Adolfo Magaldi, Claudia Rivera, Wolfgang Stremme, Kimberly Strong, Camille Viatte, Martin Van Damme, and Michel Grutter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14119–14132, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14119-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14119-2022, 2022
Short summary
Retrievals of XCO2, XCH4 and XCO from portable, near-infrared Fourier transform spectrometer solar observations in Antarctica
David Frank Pollard, Frank Hase, Mahesh Kumar Sha, Darko Dubravica, Carlos Alberti, and Dan Smale
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-130,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-130, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Impact of instrumental line shape characterization on ozone monitoring by FTIR spectrometry
Omaira E. García, Esther Sanromá, Frank Hase, Matthias Schneider, Sergio Fabián León-Luis, Thomas Blumenstock, Eliezer Sepúlveda, Carlos Torres, Natalia Prats, Alberto Redondas, and Virgilio Carreño
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4547–4567, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4547-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4547-2022, 2022
Short summary
Quantifying CH4 emissions in hard coal mines from TROPOMI and IASI observations using the wind-assigned anomaly method
Qiansi Tu, Matthias Schneider, Frank Hase, Farahnaz Khosrawi, Benjamin Ertl, Jaroslaw Necki, Darko Dubravica, Christopher J. Diekmann, Thomas Blumenstock, and Dianjun Fang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9747–9765, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9747-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9747-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
A comparison of carbon monoxide retrievals between the MOPITT satellite and Canadian high-Arctic ground-based NDACC and TCCON FTIR measurements
Ali Jalali, Kaley A. Walker, Kimberly Strong, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Merritt N. Deeter, Debra Wunch, Sébastien Roche, Tyler Wizenberg, Erik Lutsch, Erin McGee, Helen M. Worden, Pierre Fogal, and James R. Drummond
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6837–6863, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6837-2022, 2022
Short summary
Long-term validation of MIPAS ESA operational products using MIPAS-B measurements
Gerald Wetzel, Michael Höpfner, Hermann Oelhaf, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Anne Kleinert, Guido Maucher, Miriam Sinnhuber, Janna Abalichin, Angelika Dehn, and Piera Raspollini
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6669–6704, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6669-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6669-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparison of OCO-2 target observations to MUCCnet – is it possible to capture urban XCO2 gradients from space?
Maximilian Rißmann, Jia Chen, Gregory Osterman, Xinxu Zhao, Florian Dietrich, Moritz Makowski, Frank Hase, and Matthäus Kiel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6605–6623, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6605-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6605-2022, 2022
Short summary
SAGE III/ISS ozone and NO2 validation using diurnal scaling factors
Sarah A. Strode, Ghassan Taha, Luke D. Oman, Robert Damadeo, David Flittner, Mark Schoeberl, Christopher E. Sioris, and Ryan Stauffer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6145–6161, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6145-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6145-2022, 2022
Short summary
An improved OSIRIS NO2 profile retrieval in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere and intercomparison with ACE-FTS and SAGE III/ISS
Kimberlee Dubé, Daniel Zawada, Adam Bourassa, Doug Degenstein, William Randel, David Flittner, Patrick Sheese, and Kaley Walker
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6163–6180, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6163-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6163-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Aura Validation Center: EOS Aura OMI OMNO2 (Collection 3), available at: http://avdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/index.php?site=666843934&id=13, 2016.
Belmonte Rivas, M., Veefkind, P., Boersma, F., Levelt, P., Eskes, H., and Gille, J.: Intercomparison of daytime stratospheric NO2 satellite retrievals and model simulations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2203–2225, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2203-2014, 2014.
Blumenstock, T.: FTIR Izaña Total Clolumn, available at: ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/izana/ames/ftir/, 2005–2008.
Boersma, K. F., Bucsela, E. J., Brinksma, E. J., and Gleason, J. F.: NO2, in: OMI Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, 4, OMI Trace Gas Algorithms, ATB-OMI-04, Version 2.0, 20 edited by: Chance, K., 13–36, NASA Distrib. Active Archive Cent., Greenbelt, MD, USA, August 2002.
Download
Short summary
The comparison of observations performed by different techniques and satellite instruments is important. An intercomparison of the stratospheric NO2 derived from ground-based and satellite instruments has been carried out over the Izaña subtropical site. The importance of the use of the effective solar zenith angle when comparing noon measurements with twilight measurements of photochemically active species is highlighted. All instruments show positive trends in NO2 stratospheric column.