Articles | Volume 8, issue 3
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1447–1466, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1447-2015
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1447–1466, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1447-2015
Research article
20 Mar 2015
Research article | 20 Mar 2015

Cross-validation of IASI/MetOp derived tropospheric δD with TES and ground-based FTIR observations

J.-L. Lacour et al.

Related authors

Contrasting stable water isotope signals from convective and large-scale precipitation phases of a heavy precipitation event in southern Italy during HyMeX IOP 13: a modelling perspective
Keun-Ok Lee, Franziska Aemisegger, Stephan Pfahl, Cyrille Flamant, Jean-Lionel Lacour, and Jean-Pierre Chaboureau
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7487–7506, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7487-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7487-2019, 2019
Short summary
Importance of the Saharan heat low in controlling the North Atlantic free tropospheric humidity budget deduced from IASI δD observations
Jean-Lionel Lacour, Cyrille Flamant, Camille Risi, Cathy Clerbaux, and Pierre-François Coheur
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9645–9663, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9645-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9645-2017, 2017
Short summary
Observation of tropospheric δD by IASI over western Siberia: comparison with a general circulation model
M. Pommier, J.-L. Lacour, C. Risi, F. M. Bréon, C. Clerbaux, P.-F. Coheur, K. Gribanov, D. Hurtmans, J. Jouzel, and V. Zakharov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1581–1595, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1581-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1581-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Long-term validation of MIPAS ESA operational products using MIPAS-B measurements
Gerald Wetzel, Michael Höpfner, Hermann Oelhaf, Felix Friedl-Vallon, Anne Kleinert, Guido Maucher, Miriam Sinnhuber, Janna Abalichin, Angelika Dehn, and Piera Raspollini
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6669–6704, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6669-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6669-2022, 2022
Short summary
Comparison of OCO-2 target observations to MUCCnet – is it possible to capture urban XCO2 gradients from space?
Maximilian Rißmann, Jia Chen, Gregory Osterman, Xinxu Zhao, Florian Dietrich, Moritz Makowski, Frank Hase, and Matthäus Kiel
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6605–6623, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6605-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6605-2022, 2022
Short summary
SAGE III/ISS ozone and NO2 validation using diurnal scaling factors
Sarah A. Strode, Ghassan Taha, Luke D. Oman, Robert Damadeo, David Flittner, Mark Schoeberl, Christopher E. Sioris, and Ryan Stauffer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6145–6161, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6145-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6145-2022, 2022
Short summary
An improved OSIRIS NO2 profile retrieval in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere and intercomparison with ACE-FTS and SAGE III/ISS
Kimberlee Dubé, Daniel Zawada, Adam Bourassa, Doug Degenstein, William Randel, David Flittner, Patrick Sheese, and Kaley Walker
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6163–6180, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6163-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6163-2022, 2022
Short summary
TROPESS/CrIS carbon monoxide profile validation with NOAA GML and ATom in situ aircraft observations
Helen M. Worden, Gene L. Francis, Susan S. Kulawik, Kevin W. Bowman, Karen Cady-Pereira, Dejian Fu, Jennifer D. Hegarty, Valentin Kantchev, Ming Luo, Vivienne H. Payne, John R. Worden, Róisín Commane, and Kathryn McKain
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5383–5398, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5383-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5383-2022, 2022
Short summary