Articles | Volume 8, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1447-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1447-2015
Research article
 | 
20 Mar 2015
Research article |  | 20 Mar 2015

Cross-validation of IASI/MetOp derived tropospheric δD with TES and ground-based FTIR observations

J.-L. Lacour, L. Clarisse, J. Worden, M. Schneider, S. Barthlott, F. Hase, C. Risi, C. Clerbaux, D. Hurtmans, and P.-F. Coheur

Related authors

Contrasting stable water isotope signals from convective and large-scale precipitation phases of a heavy precipitation event in southern Italy during HyMeX IOP 13: a modelling perspective
Keun-Ok Lee, Franziska Aemisegger, Stephan Pfahl, Cyrille Flamant, Jean-Lionel Lacour, and Jean-Pierre Chaboureau
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7487–7506, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7487-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7487-2019, 2019
Short summary
Importance of the Saharan heat low in controlling the North Atlantic free tropospheric humidity budget deduced from IASI δD observations
Jean-Lionel Lacour, Cyrille Flamant, Camille Risi, Cathy Clerbaux, and Pierre-François Coheur
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9645–9663, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9645-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9645-2017, 2017
Short summary
Observation of tropospheric δD by IASI over western Siberia: comparison with a general circulation model
M. Pommier, J.-L. Lacour, C. Risi, F. M. Bréon, C. Clerbaux, P.-F. Coheur, K. Gribanov, D. Hurtmans, J. Jouzel, and V. Zakharov
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1581–1595, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1581-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1581-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Technique: Remote Sensing | Topic: Validation and Intercomparisons
Using a portable FTIR spectrometer to evaluate the consistency of Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) measurements on a global scale: the Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON) travel standard
Benedikt Herkommer, Carlos Alberti, Paolo Castracane, Jia Chen, Angelika Dehn, Florian Dietrich, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Matthias Max Frey, Jochen Groß, Lawson Gillespie, Frank Hase, Isamu Morino, Nasrin Mostafavi Pak, Brittany Walker, and Debra Wunch
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3467–3494, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3467-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3467-2024, 2024
Short summary
Comparison of the H2O, HDO and δD stratospheric climatologies between the MIPAS-ESA V8, MIPAS-IMK V5 and ACE-FTS V4.1/4.2 satellite datasets
Karen De Los Ríos, Paulina Ordoñez, Gabriele P. Stiller, Piera Raspollini, Marco Gai, Kaley A. Walker, Cristina Peña-Ortiz, and Luis Acosta
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3401–3418, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3401-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3401-2024, 2024
Short summary
TROPESS-CrIS CO single-pixel vertical profiles: intercomparisons with MOPITT and model simulations for 2020 western US wildfires
Ming Luo, Helen M. Worden, Robert D. Field, Kostas Tsigaridis, and Gregory S. Elsaesser
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2611–2624, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2611-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2611-2024, 2024
Short summary
TOLNet validation of satellite ozone profiles in the troposphere: impact of retrieval wavelengths
Matthew S. Johnson, Alexei Rozanov, Mark Weber, Nora Mettig, John Sullivan, Michael J. Newchurch, Shi Kuang, Thierry Leblanc, Fernando Chouza, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff, Kevin B. Strawbridge, Raul J. Alvarez, Andrew O. Langford, Christoph J. Senff, Guillaume Kirgis, Brandi McCarty, and Larry Twigg
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2559–2582, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2559-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2559-2024, 2024
Short summary
An uncertainty methodology for solar occultation flux measurements: ammonia emissions from livestock production
Johan Mellqvist, Nathalia T. Vechi, Charlotte Scheutz, Marc Durif, Francois Gautier, John Johansson, Jerker Samuelsson, Brian Offerle, and Samuel Brohede
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2465–2479, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2465-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2465-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Allan, R. P., Ringer, M. A., and Slingo, A.: Evaluation of moisture in the Hadley Centre climate model using simulations of HIRS water-vapour channel radiances, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 3371–3389, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.217, 2003.
Bates, J. J. and Jackson, D. L.: A comparison of water vapor observations with AMIPI simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 21837–21852, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01769, 1997.
Beer, R., Glavich, T. A., and Rider, D. M.: Tropospheric emission spectrometer for the Earth Observing System's Aura satellite, Appl. Optics, 40, 2356–2367, 2001.
Boesch, H., Deutscher, N. M., Warneke, T., Byckling, K., Cogan, A. J., Griffith, D. W. T., Notholt, J., Parker, R. J., and Wang, Z.: HDO / H2O ratio retrievals from GOSAT, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 599–612, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-599-2013, 2013.
Brogniez, H. and Pierrehumbert, R. T.: Intercomparison of tropical tropospheric humidity in GCMs with AMSU-B water vapor data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L17812, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL029118, 2007.
Download
Short summary
This paper describes a cross-validation study of tropospheric δD (HDO/H2O ratio) profiles retrieved from IASI spectra (retrieval performed at ULB). We document how these profiles compare to profiles derived from TES/AURA sounder and from three ground-based FTIRs of the NDACC network (produced within the MUSICA project). We show that empirical differences are in agreement with the theoretical expected differences which are dominated by IASI observational and the smoothing error components.