the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Comparisons of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) XCO2 measurements with TCCON
Debra Wunch
Paul O. Wennberg
Gregory Osterman
Brendan Fisher
Bret Naylor
Coleen M. Roehl
Christopher O'Dell
Lukas Mandrake
Camille Viatte
Matthäus Kiel
David W. T. Griffith
Nicholas M. Deutscher
Voltaire A. Velazco
Justus Notholt
Thorsten Warneke
Christof Petri
Martine De Maziere
Mahesh K. Sha
Ralf Sussmann
Markus Rettinger
David Pollard
John Robinson
Isamu Morino
Osamu Uchino
Frank Hase
Thomas Blumenstock
Dietrich G. Feist
Sabrina G. Arnold
Kimberly Strong
Joseph Mendonca
Rigel Kivi
Pauli Heikkinen
Laura Iraci
James Podolske
Patrick W. Hillyard
Shuji Kawakami
Manvendra K. Dubey
Harrison A. Parker
Eliezer Sepulveda
Omaira E. García
Pascal Jeseck
Michael R. Gunson
David Crisp
Annmarie Eldering
Related authors
Saharan dust can reach the high Arctic within only a few days, but it was unclear whether such rapid transport occurs regularly. Using atmospheric models, satellite observations, and 21 years of air-mass trajectories, we identify a recurrent pathway across the North Atlantic. This pathway becomes increasingly important at higher Arctic latitudes and efficiently carries large dust particles northward, with potential consequences for Arctic clouds and climate.
The Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite-2 (GOSAT-2) is a satellite dedicated to measuring concentrations of greenhouse gases from space. Since its launch, the increase of CH4 and CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere is clear. The datasets obtained from GOSAT-2 are used in the Copernicus atmospheric services to monitor the climate, in light of the Paris Agreement. Here we present robust datasets of these gases from GOSAT-2, including a novel machine learning approach to data quality filtering.
Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurementissued by the JCGM, the error concept and the uncertainty concept are the same. Arguments in favor of the contrary were found not to be compelling. Neither was any evidence presented that
errorsand
uncertaintiesdefine a different relation between the measured and true values, nor is a Bayesian concept beyond the mere subjective probability referred to.